直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Beer Dispute Still Brewing: Federal Circuit Ruling Leaves Fate of BROOKLYN BREW SHOP Mark Partially Undecided

November 2, 2021

Authored and Edited by Mary Kate C. Brennan; Caitlin E. Fowler; Elizabeth D. Ferrill

In Brooklyn Brewery Corp. v. Brooklyn Brew Shop, LLC, No. 20-2277 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 27, 2021), the Federal Circuit dismissed in part, affirmed in part, and vacated in part the TTAB’s denial of Brooklyn Brewery Corp.’s (“BBC”) petition to cancel the BROOKLYN BREW SHOP mark and BBC’s opposition to Brooklyn Brew Shop’s (“BBS”) application to register a stylized version of the same mark.

With respect to BBC’s cancellation petition, the Federal Circuit held that the TTAB properly denied BBC’s petition due to laches in light of BBC’s four-year delay in bringing an action.  With respect to BBC’s opposition to BBS’s application for goods in Class 5, the Court found that BBC lacked Article III standing to appeal the TTAB’s decision because it does not make or sell goods in this class and, thus, could not establish an injury in fact.  With respect to BBC’s opposition to BBS’s application for goods in Class 32, the Court found that the TTAB did not err in rejecting BBC’s likelihood-of-confusion claims or in failing to consider BBC’s geographic descriptiveness claim.  However, the Court found that the TTAB erred in evaluating whether BBS demonstrated that the applied-for mark has acquired distinctiveness as to beer-making kits in Class 32.  Thus, the Court vacated and remanded on that issue. 

Tags

Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Food and Beverage

Consumer Products

Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Contacts

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Copyright © 2021 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

13th Annual Summit for Women Leaders in Life Sciences Law

July 29-30, 2026

Boston

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for March–May 2026

July 2, 2026

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: May 2026

June 30, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Deadline Evolution: Director Extends Deadline for Requesting Director Review of Institution Grants to 30 Days

June 30, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP