直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

European IP Blog

UPC Update - German Act of Approval to the UPC Is Void

20 March 2020

Authored and Edited by Sanam Habib; Nicholas Russell Philip Fox; Maeve O'Flynn

Earlier this year, the United Kingdom (UK) decided to not participate in the Unified Patent Court (UPC) system. As of this morning, it appears Germany may follow in UK’s footsteps.

In June 2017, the German constitutional court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) asked the German legislator to not put the implementing legislation for the UPC and Unitary Patent into force. The complaint, which was brought forward by a German attorney, highlighted that the manner in which German Parliament had approved UPC violated the German constitution.

After almost three years, the German constitutional court at last made a decision. An official press release was published by the Bundesverfassungsgericht this morning, holding that the Act of Approval to the Agreement on the UPC is void. A majority of the judges of the Court were of the view that the German basic law required that the act establishing the Court needed to be passed by a two-thirds majority in the German parliament as it would grant a supra-national court jurisdiction over matters which would otherwise be dealt with in the German courts. The decision was clearly finely balanced with some members of the court issuing dissenting opinions.

Although the decision is narrowly based, it is likely that this decision will be the final death blow for the proposed Unified Patent Court.

Previously, in 2018, the Hungarian constitutional court ruled that Hungarian participation in the UPC would require a constitutional amendment as it would involve a transfer of sovereignty from the national courts to a supra-national court.

Now with the UK having decided to not participate in the UPC, the German courts upholding the complaint against German ratification of the UPC agreement, the ruling of the Hungarian court not allowing Hungary to ratify the UPC, and Poland and Spain refusing to sign the UPC agreement, it is highly unlikely that the UPC will enter into force.

The UPC had promised to provide a forum for rationalizing patent litigation in Europe as it provided a means by which patent disputes across Europe could be resolved in a single court action. Given the difficulties that the UPC now faces, the existing litigation system in which patentees must bring separate court actions in each jurisdiction looks set to continue for the foreseeable future.

For further information, please do not hesitate to contact Finnegan.

Tags

European Patent Office (EPO)

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Unitary Patent System (UPS) and the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Related Industries

Energy

Oil and Gas

Related Offices

London

Contacts

Maeve O'Flynn
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2856
Email

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: May 2026

June 30, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Deadline Evolution: Director Extends Deadline for Requesting Director Review of Institution Grants to 30 Days

June 30, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Redesigns Done Right at the ITC: Federal Circuit Affirms ITC Determination of Noninfringement of Redesigned Products

June 26, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Mere Invalidity of Asserted Claims Does Not Render Patent Infringement Case Exceptional or Warrant Sanctions

June 26, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms Noninfringement Ruling in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Based on Claim Construction, Prosecution History Estoppel, and the Disclosure-Dedication Rule

June 26, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Holds Defend Trade Secrets Act Claim Untimely Filed

June 22, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP