直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

European IP Blog

First UPC Preliminary Injunction Issued Ex Parte Despite Protective Brief

7 August 2023

Authored and Edited by Dr. Antje Brambrink

After an application was  filed on June 22, 2023, the Local Division Düsseldorf (Germany) issued  one of the Unified Patent Court‘s (UPC) first preliminary injunctions on the same day. It relates to the dispute between myStromer AG against Revolt Zycling AG on infringement of the European Patent EP 2 546 134 which protects a “Combination structure of bicycle frame and motor hub”. According to its wording, the injunction covers the UPC member states, where the patent is in force, in particular Germany, the Netherlands, France, and Italy.

The reasoning is very concise. The Respondent had previously submitted a protective brief raising defenses such as exhaustion. After confirming infringement, the judges briefly dealt with the defense arguments and rejected them without hearing the Respondent (ex parte injunction). The Court considered the case  urgent (Rule 209.2 (b) of the Rules of Procedure) due to an upcoming trade fair where the attacked embodiments were supposed to be shown. The Division held the patent’s validity was sufficiently secured. Neither opposition nor nullity proceedings had been brought and the Respondent had not provided relevant prior art. Hence the Court granted the injunction.

3 Take Aways

  • UPC preliminary injunction proceedings can be extremely fast.

The UPC is fully prepared to deal with applications for preliminary injunctions in an extremely speedy manner. Injunctions may even be granted within one day , depending on the urgency of the case.

  • Applicants can get an ex parte injunction in case of urgency.

The judges have discretion when deciding on the preliminary injunction, in particular whether they want to hear opposing party or not. If applicants can build a strong urgency case, chances for an ex parte injunction should be good, provided that all other requirements for its grant are met.

  • Potential Respondents should be cautious with protective briefs.

The protective brief did not prevent the grant of an injunction. It may  have even triggered the issuance of an ex parte injunction since the Court was able to deal with the Respondent’s defense arguments. Potential infringers who fear the grant of a preliminary injunction should thus carefully weigh the pros and cons when considering such a brief.

Tags

Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Unitary Patent System (UPS) and the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Related Offices

Munich

Contacts

Dr. Antje Brambrink
Partner
Munich
+49 89 83931 1239
Email

Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in May 2026

July 31, 2026

Articles

Blaker v. NetScout Systems: A Narrow Reading of the Pen Register and Trap and Trace Provisions of the California Invasion of Privacy Act in California State Court

July 29, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: June 2026

July 28, 2026

IP Updates

Too Concrete to Fail: Ceiva’s Guidance on the Use of Sufficiently Concrete Structures to Overcome Section 101 Rejections

July 28, 2026

Conference

2026 China Pharmaceutical Innovation Conference

July 22-24, 2026

Shanghai

Articles

This Article Was Written Entirely by AI — Welcome to Synthetic Patent Litigation

July/August 2026

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP