21 October 2024
Authored and Edited by Jamie E. Barcombe; Craig Slater, Ph.D.; Maeve O'Flynn
In a much-awaited decision, Technical Board of Appeal 3.3.04, in T 56/21, has not referred questions to the Enlarged Board of Appeal on the requirement for applicants to amend the description for consistency with the claims prior to grant.
The decision indicates that the Board does not consider there to be legal basis for requiring the adaptation of the description.
Copyright © 2024 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information
Webinar
PTAB Developments and Their Impact on Parallel Litigation: Strategic Considerations
August 26, 2026
Webinar
At the PTAB Blog
Squires Issues Precedential Decision Clarifying Obviousness-Type Double Patenting Rejections
August 17, 2026
European IP Blog
UPC Action Permissibly Lodged Prior to the Grant of a European Patent
12 August 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.