直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

European IP Blog

Brexit - No Added Matter

February 25, 2016

Authored and Edited by Leythem A. Wall; Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.

The UK government has scheduled a referendum on the UK’s membership of the European Union (EU) for 23 June 2016. While many commentators predict the outcome will be not to leave the EU, regardless of the outcome, this will have no effect on the European Patent Convention (EPC). The UK is a member state of the EPC and its membership in the EU has no bearing. The European Patent Office (EPO) is not an EU institution and will still be able to grant patent applications that can be validated in the UK. Representation rights of British European patent attorneys before the EPO also remain unaffected.

Looking ahead to 2017 when the Unified Patent Court (UPC), an EU institution, is expected to open its doors, a Brexit would not stop this going forward but may affect whether a Central Division of the Court will still be located in London. Also the jurisdiction of the UPC will not extend to the UK.

Although other UK legal professions may be affected, British European patent attorneys can still have full representation rights before the UPC and would still be able to obtain EU Unitary Patents on behalf of their clients.

To read more about the UPC please go to ‘European Patent Practice - The Unitary Patent System and the Unified Patent Court’.

Tags

Brexit, European Patent Office (EPO), Unified Patent Court (UPC), Unitary Patent System

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Unitary Patent System (UPS) and the Unified Patent Court (UPC)

Contacts

Amanda K. Murphy, Ph.D.
Partner
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2814
Email

Copyright © 2016 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Deadline Evolution: Director Extends Deadline for Requesting Director Review of Institution Grants to 30 Days

June 30, 2026

Articles

How Low Can You Go? Courts Lower Marking Defense Burden, Raising Patent Damages Risks

June 29, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms Noninfringement Ruling in Hatch-Waxman Litigation Based on Claim Construction, Prosecution History Estoppel, and the Disclosure-Dedication Rule

June 26, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Mere Invalidity of Asserted Claims Does Not Render Patent Infringement Case Exceptional or Warrant Sanctions

June 26, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Redesigns Done Right at the ITC: Federal Circuit Affirms ITC Determination of Noninfringement of Redesigned Products

June 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP