直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

PTAB to Broadcast First Ever IPR Oral Hearing

August 15, 2013

Authored and Edited by Michael V. Young

On August 16, 2013, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) will hold its first ever oral hearing for an inter partes review proceeding. Fittingly, the hearing arises in the first IPR filed under the AIA, IPR2012-00001(Garmin International, Inc. et al. v. Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC). These proceedings relate to Garmin International’s challenge of U.S. Patent No. 6,778,074, owned by Cuozzo Speed Technologies and covering a speed limit indicator.

Garmin and Cuozzo will present arguments on the validity of original and substitute claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103  in view of various combinations of prior art—making this the first oral hearing before the PTAB to address obviousness under any AIA post-grant procedure. In contrast, the April 17, 2013, oral hearing in CBM2012-00001 under the Transitional Program for Covered Business Method Patents addressed validity only under 35 U.S.C. § 101.

The August 16 Oral Hearing will proceed at 1 p.m. Eastern at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and be publicly broadcast via teleconference. Access details to the teleconference number are available on the PTAB’s website.

 

Tags

Cuozzo Speed Technologies LLC v. Lee, Garmin v. Cuozzo, United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)

Contacts

Michael V. Young
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2788
Email

Copyright © 2013 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information. 

Related Insights

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP