直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in April and May 2024

June 27, 2024

Authored and Edited by Daniel F. Klodowski; Umber Aggarwal; Nicholas A. Eitsert; A. Sasha Hoyt; Elliot C. Cook

In April, the PTAB cancelled 506 (76.67%) instituted claims across 44 IPR and PGR Final Written Decisions, including decisions issued following remand from the Federal Circuit.  After review, 154 (23.33%) instituted claims survived, and patent owners did not concede any instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer.  For comparison, the cumulative average cancellation rate of instituted claims in IPR, CBM, and PGR Final Written Decisions is about 73%.

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 31 (70.45%) decisions, all instituted claims survived in 10 (22.73%) decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 3 (6.82%) decisions.  A mixed outcome occurs where at least one instituted or substitute claim remains patentable, and at least one is cancelled, in a Final Written Decision. 

In May, a relatively favorable month for patent owners, the PTAB cancelled 313 (60.08%) instituted claims across 30 IPR and PGR Final Written Decisions. In those decisions, 208 (39.92%) instituted claims survived.  For the second month in a row, in an unusual trend, patent owners did not file any motions to amend in IPRs or PGRs reaching final decision, nor did they concede any instituted claims through motions to amend or disclaimer. 

On a per-case basis, no instituted or substitute claims survived in 15 (50%) decisions, all instituted claims survived in 11 (36.67%) decisions, and a mixed outcome occurred in 4 (13.33%) decisions in May.  

Through May 31, 2024, the PTAB has cumulatively granted 623 (15.60%) proposed substitute claims in motions to amend in IPRs while denying 3,371 (84.40%) proposed substitute claims. 

The overall cumulative instituted claim survival rate in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs through May 31, 2024, broken down by technology center, is as follows:

The cumulative number of Final Written Decisions through May 31, 2024, separated by technology center, is as follows:

Additional cumulative statistics on the Board’s IPR, CBM, and PGR decisions, updated through May 31, 2024, are available here on the At the PTAB blog. 

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email
Umber Aggarwal
Associate
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2423
Email
Nicholas A. Eitsert
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4157
Email
A. Sasha Hoyt
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4000
Email
Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email

Copyright © 2024 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Conference

IP Life Sciences Forum 2026

December 13-15, 2026

Coral Gables

Panel Discussion

2026 Advanced Patent Law Institute

December 3-4, 2026

Stanford

Webinar

Data and Market Exclusivity: An Update on China’s New Law and Comparisons to the US and Europe

November 19, 2026

Webinar

Seminar

The Augmented Practice 2026: Balancing AI Opportunity, Governance, and Risk

November 5, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

2026 TIPA International Symposium

October 30, 2026

Taipei City

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Hybrid Conference

2026 Patent Law Institute: Critical Issues & Best Practices – New York

October 29, 2026

New York

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Seminar

Annual Intellectual Property Law Section Fall Seminar

October 16, 2026

Alexandria

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP