直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for September-November 2025

December 30, 2025

Authored and Edited by Daniel F. Klodowski; Michelle G. Rice; Jason E. Stach; Elliot C. Cook

In September through November, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued 34 total opinions in appeals from post-grant proceedings at the PTAB (all of which were IPRs).  In September, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 6 cases (60%).  The court issued a mixed outcome in 3 cases (30%), including a precedential opinion in Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (No. 23-2434).  The Court issued 1 dismissal (10%) on substantive (e.g., non-settlement) grounds and did not issue any opinions in which all issues were reversed or vacated.

September-2025-IPR-and-PGR-Appeals-Combined-Case-Outcomes

In October, a relatively favorable month for appellees compared to historical trends, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 13 cases (81.25%), including in precedential opinions in Causam Enterprises, Inc. v. Ecobee Technologies ULC (No. 24-1958) and Merck Serono S.A. v. Hopewell Pharma Ventures, Inc. (No. 25-1210).  The court issued 1 opinion (6.25%) where every issue was vacated and remanded, which is a precedential opinion in Centripetal Networks LLC v. Palo Alto Networks, Inc. (No. 23-2027); and issued a mixed outcome in 2 appeals (12.50%).  The court did not dismiss any opinions on substantive grounds.

October-2025-IPR-and-PGR-Appeals-Combined-Case-Outcomes

In November, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 6 cases (75%).  The court issued 2 opinions in which every issue was reversed or vacated (25%) and did not issue any opinions with mixed outcomes or dismissals on substantive grounds.

November-2025-IPR-and-PGR-Combined-Case-Outcomes

Through November 30, 2025, the Federal Circuit cumulatively decided 1,531 appeals from the PTAB in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs.  While the vast majority of these appeals came from IPR proceedings, the number of PGR appeals has slowly increased over time, though no new PGR appellate opinions were issued in the September-November timeframe.

In IPR appeals, the Federal Circuit has cumulatively affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 1084 cases (74.86%) and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 174 cases (12.02%).  A mixed outcome on appeal occurred in 148 cases (10.22%), and the court dismissed 42 IPR appeals (2.90%) without rendering a decision on the merits. 

IPR-Appeals-Case-Outcomes

In PGR appeals, the Federal Circuit cumulatively affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 19 cases (65.52%), issued a mixed outcome in 3 cases (10.34%), reversed or vacated every issue in 6 cases (20.69%), and dismissed 1 (3.45%) appeal on substantive (e.g., non-settlement) grounds.  These numbers are unchanged since August.

PGR-Appeals-Case-Outcomes

Taken together, in decisions for IPR, CBM, and PGR appeals, the Federal Circuit affirmed every issue in 1,144 cases (74.72%), issued a mixed outcome in 155 cases (10.12%), reversed or vacated every issue in 185 cases (12.08%), and dismissed 47 cases (3.07%) on substantive grounds.

IPR-CBM-and-PGR-Appeals-Combined-Case-Outcomes

Of the 1,531 IPR, CBM, and PGR cumulative appeals that it has considered, the Federal Circuit issued Rule 36 affirmances in 634 cases (41.41%).  The court issued written opinions, including affirmances, reversals, dismissals, and mixed decisions, in 897 cases (58.59%).  The ratio of Rule 36 affirmances to written decisions has generally trended downward over time and further declined through the September-November period.

IPR-CBM-and-PGR-Appeals-Rule-36-Affirmations

Subscribe to Finnegan’s At the PTAB Blog for the latest updates, analysis, and statistics on PTAB practice, including statistics for post-grant appeals here.

Subscribe to Finnegan’s Federal Circuit IP blog for the latest updates and analysis on Federal Circuit decisions here.

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Reston, VA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email
Michelle_Yongyuan_Rice
Michelle G. Rice
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4229
Email
Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email
Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email

Copyright © 2025 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case

May 14, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay

May 14, 2026

IP Updates

Tenth Circuit Sides with Netflix in Tiger King Copyright Challenge 

May 5, 2026

Conference

International Trade Commission Litigation & Enforcement

May 4-5, 2026

Washington, DC

Articles

Unpacking Squires’ Recent Discretionary Denial Guidance Focusing on American Manufacturing

April 24, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patents Because Inventorship Could Not Be Corrected Without Giving All Inventors Notice and an Opportunity to Be Heard

April 22, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Reverses Indefiniteness Ruling on Means-Plus-Function Claim

April 15, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP