Associate
Michelle Rice focuses on complex patent litigation, drawing insights from two federal court clerkships and extensive patent prosecution experience. She is passionate about intellectual property (IP) protection for each client, large or small, while appreciating the role IP strategy plays in serving overall business goals. Michelle enjoys learning about clients’ innovations and crafting strategies for how to best protect them.
Michelle’s litigation experience ranges from Section 337 investigations before the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and cases filed in district court to post-grant proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). She works on prosecution and litigation matters involving a wide range of technologies, including electronics, telecommunications, software, semiconductors, data processing, and business methods.
Prior to joining Finnegan, Michelle interned at Microsoft (China), where she assisted in Chinese IP policy analysis as well as discussions with Chinese government agencies regarding the latest developments in IP regulations. She also interned in Beijing at a Chinese law firm and an international law firm. She assisted in trademark prosecution and enforcement, and pre-litigation investigations.
NetApp, Inc./HPE et al. v. KOM Software Inc.
IPR2019-00591, -00592, -00594, -00598, -00601, -00603, -00604, -00606, -00607, -00608, PTAB, Judges McGraw, Galligan, Dougal, Fishman
20-2345, -2346; 21-1181, -1075 -1005, Fed. Cir., Judges Prost, Chen, Taranto
Certain Modular LED Display Panels and Components Thereof
337-TA-1114, ITC, Judge Shaw
Delta Faucet Company v. Globe Union Industrial Corp. et al.
1:20-cv-02802, S.D. Ind., Judges Pratt, Dinsmore
Barco NV and Barco, Inc. v. Vivitek Corp. and Delta Electronics, Inc.
4:19-cv-03250, N.D. Cal., Judge Tigar
Lazer IP LLC v. Nuvoton Technology Corporation America
1:21-cv-00607, D. Del., Judge Andrews
Ultravision Technologies, LLC v. Shenzhen AOTO Electronics Co., Ltd.
2:18-cv-00113, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne
IPR2021-00190, PTAB, Judges Pothier, Daniels, Kinder
At the PTAB Blog
Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for March–May 2026 Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for March–May 2026
July 2, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for December 2025 - February 2026 Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for December 2025 - February 2026
March 31, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – February 2026 Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – February 2026
February 2, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – January 2026 Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – January 2026
January 5, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for September-November 2025 Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for September-November 2025
December 30, 2025
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – December 2025 Spotlight on Upcoming Oral Arguments – December 2025
December 1, 2025
Media Mention
Fed. Circ. Upholds Partial Ax of 7 Data Storage Patents Fed. Circ. Upholds Partial Ax of 7 Data Storage Patents
December 17, 2021
Law360Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.