直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for July, August, and September 2024

November 5, 2024

Authored and Edited by Daniel F. Klodowski; Audrey J. Parker; Jason E. Stach; Elliot C. Cook

In post-grant appeals from the PTAB to the Federal Circuit in July, August, and September, the outcomes were generally in line with long-term trends in favoring appellees.  In July, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 12 cases (75%), including its precedential opinion in Sanho Corp. v. Kaijet Technology International Ltd. (No. 23-1336).  The court also reversed or vacated every issue in 2 appeals (12.5%).  The court issued 1 mixed outcome (6.25%), in which at least one issue was affirmed and at least one issue was not, in its precedential opinion in ZyXEL Communications Corp. v. UNM Rainforest Innovations (No. 22-2220).  The court dismissed 1 appeal (6.25%) on substantive (e.g., non-settlement) grounds in a precedential opinion in Koss Corp. v. Bose Corp. (No. 22-2090). 

In August, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 7 cases (70%) on appeal from post-grant proceedings, including in its precedential decision in Voice Tech Corp. v. Unified Patents, LLC (No. 22-2163).  The court issued 1 opinion with a mixed outcome (10%), and dismissed 1 appeal (10%) on substantive grounds in its precedential decision in Platinum Optics Technology Inc. v. Viavi Solutions Inc. (No. 23-1227).  The court issued 1 opinion (10%) in which every issue was reversed or vacated.

In September, the court issued 6 opinions (85.71%) in which every issue was affirmed, and 1 opinion with a mixed outcome (14.29%).  The court did not issue any substantive dismissals or opinions in which every issue was reversed or vacated, and the court did not issue any precedential opinions in September.

Through September 30, 2024, the Federal Circuit cumulatively decided 1,357 appeals from the PTAB in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs.  While the vast majority of these appeals came from IPR proceedings, the number of PGR appeals has slowly increased over time.

In IPR appeals, the Federal Circuit has cumulatively affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 956 cases (74.75%) and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 156 cases (12.20%).  A mixed outcome on appeal occurred in 127 cases (9.93%), and the court dismissed 40 IPR appeals (3.13%) without rendering a decision on the merits.

In PGR appeals, the Federal Circuit cumulatively affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 16 cases (69.57%), issued a mixed outcome in 3 cases (13.04%), and reversed or vacated every issue in 4 cases (17.39%).  No PGR appeals have been dismissed on substantive grounds.

Taken together, in decisions for IPR, CBM, and PGR appeals, the Federal Circuit affirmed every issue in 1013 cases (74.71%), issued a mixed outcome in 134 cases (9.88%), reversed or vacated every issue in 165 cases (12.17%), and dismissed 44 cases (3.24%) on substantive grounds.

Of the 1,357 IPR, CBM, and PGR cumulative appeals that it has considered, the Federal Circuit issued Rule 36 affirmances in 580 cases (42.74%).  The court issued written opinions, including affirmances, reversals, dismissals, and mixed decisions, in 777 cases (57.26%).  The ratio of Rule 36 affirmances to written decisions has generally trended downward over time.

Subscribe to Finnegan’s At the PTAB Blog for the latest updates, analysis, and statistics on PTAB practice, including statistics for post-grant appeals: https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/blogs/at-the-ptab-blog/index.html.

Subscribe to Finnegan’s Federal Circuit IP blog for the latest updates and analysis on Federal Circuit decisions: https://www.finnegan.com/en/insights/blogs/federal-circuit-ip/index.html. 

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email
Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email
Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email

Copyright © 2024 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case

May 14, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay

May 14, 2026

IP Updates

Tenth Circuit Sides with Netflix in Tiger King Copyright Challenge 

May 5, 2026

Conference

International Trade Commission Litigation & Enforcement

May 4-5, 2026

Washington, DC

Articles

Unpacking Squires’ Recent Discretionary Denial Guidance Focusing on American Manufacturing

April 24, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patents Because Inventorship Could Not Be Corrected Without Giving All Inventors Notice and an Opportunity to Be Heard

April 22, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP