直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Firm
  • Offices
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • IP Health Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for December 2022

February 1, 2023

By Daniel F. Klodowski; Audrey J. Parker

Edited by Jason E. Stach; Elliot C. Cook

In December, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 5 (83.33%) cases on appeal from post-grant proceedings and issued a mixed outcome in 1 (16.67%) case, which occurs when at least one issue is affirmed and at least one issue is vacated or reversed in an opinion.  The Federal Circuit did not reverse or vacate every issue on the merits in an opinion, nor did it dismiss any appeals, which may occur, for example, when the Federal Circuit determines that it does not have jurisdiction over an appeal. 

Through December 31, 2022, the Federal Circuit cumulatively decided 1,097 appeals from the PTAB in IPRs, CBMs, and PGRs.  While the vast majority of these appeals came from IPR proceedings, the number of PGR appeals has slowly increased over time, partially offsetting a near-total decline in the number of CBM appeals.

In IPR appeals, the Federal Circuit has cumulatively affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 753 (72.97%) cases and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 134 (12.98%) cases.  A mixed outcome on appeal occurred in 111 (10.76%) cumulative cases, and the court dismissed 34 (3.29%) IPR appeals without rendering a decision on the merits.   

In CBM appeals, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 38 (74.51%) cases, reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 5 (9.80%) cases, issued a mixed outcome in 4 (7.84%) cases, and dismissed 4 (7.84%) cases. 

In PGR appeals, the Federal Circuit cumulatively affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 9 (64.29%) cases, issued a mixed outcome in 1 (7.14%) case, and reversed or vacated every issue in 4 (28.57%) cases.  No PGR appeals have been dismissed on the merits.

Taken together, in decisions for IPR, CBM, and PGR appeals, the Federal Circuit affirmed every issue in 800 (72.93%) cases, issued a mixed outcome in 116 (10.57%) cases, reversed or vacated every issue in 143 (13.04%) cases, and dismissed 38 (3.46%) cases.

Of the 1,097 IPR, CBM, and PGR appeals it has considered thus far, the Federal Circuit issued Rule 36 affirmances in 472 (43.03%) cases.  The court issued written opinions, including affirmances, reversals, dismissals, and mixed decisions, in 625 (56.97%) cases.  The ratio of Rule 36 affirmances to issued decisions has trended steadily downward over time.

Related Practices

Appeals

Patent Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Post-Grant Review: IPR, PGR, and CBM

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Reston, VA

Washington, DC

Contacts

Daniel F. Klodowski
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4216
Email
Audrey J. Parker
Associate
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4000
Email
Jason_Stach
Jason E. Stach
Partner
Atlanta, GA
+1 404 653 6428
Email
Elliot_Cook
Elliot C. Cook
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2738
Email

Copyright © 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 


DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. One of our lawyers will be happy to discuss the possibility of representation with you. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

INCONTESTABLE® Blog

Widening Circuit Split, Eleventh Circuit Decides Retroactive Damages Are Recoverable for Timely Copyright Claims

March 22, 2023

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Dietary Supplement Patent Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101, Federal Circuit Affirms

March 17, 2023

Articles

The Apex Doctrine and Depositions of High-Level Executives: The Divide Among Circuit Courts

March 14, 2023

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in January 2023

March 13, 2023

Books

Comparative Global Design Law 2022 Update

March 2023

Conference

2023 PTAB Bar Annual Conference

March 8, 2023

Washington

At the PTAB Blog

Will Exclusionary Criteria Be Excluded as Claim Limitations? Time Will Tell as PTAB Institutes IPR in Mylan v. Regeneron

March 8, 2023

Articles

Trending at The PTAB: Fintiv Is Alive, But With Way Less Zip

March 3, 2023

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for January 2023

March 3, 2023

Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.

The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).

Finnegan
Click Here
  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • EEO Statement

© 2023 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP