August 17, 2017
Authored and Edited by Elliot C. Cook; Daniel F. Klodowski; David C. Seastrunk; Jason E. Stach
Through August 1, 2017, the Federal Circuit decided 236 PTAB appeals from IPRs and CBMs. The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 175 (74.15%) cases, and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 25 (10.59%) cases. A mixed outcome on appeal, where at least one issue was affirmed and at least one issue was vacated or reversed, occurred in 26 (11.02%) cases.
The court dismissed 10 (4.24%) appeals without rendering a decision on the merits. Dismissals may occur, for example, where the Federal Circuit determines that it does not have jurisdiction to hear an appeal, such as in an appeal from a PTAB institution decision. As the Supreme Court established in Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC v. Lee, the Federal Circuit is barred from considering appeals from at least certain aspects of institution decisions under 35 U.S.C. § 314(d). Dismissals may also result from settlements among the parties to the appeal, or where the court determines that a prior decision renders an appeal moot.
An important tool that helps the Federal Circuit manage its significant docket of PTAB appeals is the Rule 36 affirmance, whereby the court affirms the PTAB without rendering a full, written opinion. Of the 224 PTAB appeals it has considered thus far, the Federal Circuit has issued Rule 36 affirmances in 112 (47.46%) cases. The court issued written opinions, including affirmances, reversals, dismissals, and mixed decisions, in 124 (52.54%) cases.
Breaking down the numbers further, in its appeals from IPRs, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 156 (74.29%) cases, reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 23 (10.95%) cases, issued a mixed outcome in 24 (11.43%) cases, and dismissed 7 (3.33%) cases.
In CBM appeals, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in 19 (73.08%) cases, issued a mixed outcome in 2 (7.69%) cases, dismissed 3 (11.54%) cases, and reversed or vacated the PTAB on every issue in 2 (7.69%) cases.
Stay tuned to the AIA Blog for the latest updates, analysis, and statistics on all aspects of PTAB and Federal Circuit practice. Subscribe to the AIA Blog to receive notifications of new posts via email.
Copyright © 2017 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026
May 26, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
May 20, 2026
Webinar
Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement
May 18, 2026
Webinar
Federal Circuit IP Blog
When “and” and “e.g.” Matter: Federal Circuit Revives VLSI vs. Intel Case
May 14, 2026
Federal Circuit IP Blog
Federal Circuit Affirms § 102(b) Invalidity; Source Code Commands Are Not Hearsay
May 14, 2026
Articles
Unpacking Squires’ Recent Discretionary Denial Guidance Focusing on American Manufacturing
April 24, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.