直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit Finds Estoppel May Apply After Pre-Institution Disclaimer

February 5, 2018

Authored and Edited by David C. Seastrunk; Cory C. Bell

In Arthrex v. Smith & Nephew, a split panel affirmed a PTAB decision entering an adverse judgment when a patent owner disclaimed all claims challenged in a IPR petition prior to institution.  By disclaiming all claims at issue, the patent owner was attempting to avoid the estoppel effects of 37 C.F.R. § 42.73(d) that apply with issuance of an adverse judgment.

The Federal Circuit also confirmed that a patent owner can appeal a pre-institution adverse judgment ruling under 35 U.S.C. § 1295, because an adverse judgment is a final decision disposing of an IPR proceeding.

For more details on this decision, check out this article by Pier DeRoo.  The Federal Circuit also recently held en banc that appellate review was available for any time bar determinations by the PTAB under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b), overruling precedent.  A detailed writeup of that decision, prepared by David Weingarten, is available here.  Stay tuned to the AIA blog for updates as these events occur.

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), estoppel, jurisdiction, Aqua Products v. Matal

For more information

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Contacts

Cory C. Bell
Partner
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1641
Email

Copyright © 2018 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. 

DISCLAIMER: Although we wish to hear from you, information exchanged in this blog cannot and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Please do not post any information that you consider to be personal or confidential. If you wish for Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP to consider representing you, in order to establish an attorney-client relationship you must first enter a written representation agreement with Finnegan. Contact us for additional information. Additional disclaimer information.

Related Insights

Lecture

Munich Licensing Summer Course 2026

June 18-19, 2026

Munich

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Before the Holding, the Message: Director Squires Uses Magnolia Medical to Outline PTAB Discretionary Denial Policy Changes

May 20, 2026

Webinar

Changes at the PTAB from Settled Expectations to Real Parties in Interest to Director Involvement

May 18, 2026

Webinar

Articles

COPPA’s Amended Rule Is Now in Full Effect: What Operators Need to Know

May 15, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP