直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Remarks on the Decision ‘Duty to Digitalize for Rendering Information and Accounts’

July 7, 2022

GRUR-Prax

By Dr. Moritz Meckel

If a patent owner wants to claim damages from an infringer, he bears the burden of proof for the facts substantiating the amount to be claimed. Further, he has a legitimate interest in learning about the delivery chain of infringing products both up- and down-stream from any particular infringer. However, unlike the US, the German legal system does not foresee any court-supervised fact-finding procedure such as discovery. Instead, the patent owner has a claim for information on the delivery chain and rendering of accounts regarding the acts of patent infringement. This claim is usually asserted in a first round of infringement litigation, together with a request for an injunction.

The District Court in Munich (“Landgericht München I”) now decided that the data owed shall be provided to the patentee also in a computer-readable format, even if the infringer has these data only on paper. The infringer therefore shall make them computer-readable. Finnegan partner Moritz Meckel summarizes the court decision dated 12 November 2021, file ref. 21 O 10885/16.

Read “Remarks on the Decision ‘Duty to Digitalize for Rendering Information and Accounts’”, GRUR-Prax 2022, 385.

Tags

infringement, burden of proof

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Offices

Munich

Related Professionals

Dr. Moritz Meckel
Partner
Munich
+49 89 83931 1235
Email

Originally printed in GRUR-Pax on July 7, 2022. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Reception

2026 IPO Education Foundation Awards Dinner

December 15, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

IAM Live: Navigating the UPC 2026

November 4, 2026

Paris

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 AIPLA Annual Meeting

October 29-31, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Seminar

Future IP UK

October 21, 2026

London

Conference

ChIPs Global Summit 2026

October 21-23, 2026

Los Angeles

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Conference

31st Annual UMass Chan Research Retreat

October 14-15, 2026

Worcester

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP