直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Article

Luxury Brands, Global Data, and Personalized Marketing: Tips for Compliance in the UK, EU and US

June 6, 2025

By Nessa Khandaker; Lynn Parker Dupree

  1. Cross-Border Data Transfers Require Strategic Safeguards: Luxury brands operating globally must navigate complex data transfer rules under the UK and EU GDPR, including adequacy decisions, standard contractual clauses, and transfer risk assessments. Transfers to the U.S. are only streamlined for organizations certified under the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework and its UK extension.

  2. Profiling and Personalization Attract Regulatory Scrutiny: While personalization is central to luxury marketing, profiling activities must comply with GDPR and emerging U.S. state laws. Brands must ensure transparency, obtain valid consent or rely on legitimate interests, and avoid discriminatory outcomes in targeted advertising.

  3. Compliance-Driven Personalization is Key to Customer Trust: To maintain exclusivity without legal risk, luxury brands should map data flows, provide granular privacy controls, and ensure vendor compliance. Embedding privacy into marketing strategies enables brands to adhere to privacy laws while still providing luxurious customer experiences.

Luxury is intertwined with data. Whether it is curating private shopping events, offering exclusive perks, or delivering bespoke digital experiences, luxury brands increasingly rely on customer insights and seamless cross-border data flows. As luxury marketing becomes more data-driven, luxury brands must stay aware of their regulatory requirements.

International data transfers and personalization are two areas of key importance to our clients in the luxury space. Both issues are governed tightly in the UK under the UK GDPR, the EU under the EU GDPR and there are increasing issues to be aware of in the US under a patchwork of federal guidance and state laws.

This article explores how luxury brands can leverage personal data in compliance with legal frameworks across borders and technologies without compromising customer trust or risking violation of UK, EU and US regulations.

International Data Transfers

Luxury brands operate in a global ecosystem. By way of example, customer relationship management systems may be based in the US, with marketing operations in Europe, and e-commerce platforms serving customers across Asia and the Middle East. However, transferring personal data across borders, especially from the UK or EU to third countries requires careful consideration. We summarize some of those fundamental considerations below.

UK and EU

Under both the UK GDPR and EU GDPR, personal data cannot be transferred to third countries unless:

  • The country has an adequacy decision from the relevant UK or EU regulatory body (this list of countries may differ from time to time between the UK and EU); or
  • The transfer is subject to appropriate safeguards. Examples include the UK International Data Transfer Agreement (IDTA) or standard contract clauses, or GDPR compliant binding corporate rules for intra-group transfers; or
  • A narrow derogation applies, such as explicit consent for a one-off transfer.

Additionally, brands in the UK or EU must perform either a UK transfer risk assessment or EU Transfer Impact Assessment to evaluate the legal risks in the recipient country before making a transfer. Brands therefore will have to make case by case assessments of whether the data being exported will receive a level of protection equivalent to the UK or EU GDPR, respectively.

US

Generally speaking, US laws do not impose restrictions on the transfer of personal information outside the USA. Notably however, US regulators note that whilst data can be freely exported, US protections still apply to personal data after it leaves the US.

US-based luxury brands should note that both the EU and the UK do not recognize the United States as offering GDPR adequacy unless certain circumstances exist. EU and UK GDPR adequacy is extended to commercial organizations participating in the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (and its UK extension). For brands, this means transfers of personal data may be made to US organizations certified under these frameworks without the need for transfer mechanisms such as standard contract clauses, or binding corporate rules.

Profiling and Personalization

Personalization is central to luxury marketing as brands use data to curate exclusive offers, predict preferences, and build long-term loyalty. But when these activities involve profiling or automated decision-making, they fall under regulatory scrutiny.

UK and EU

Under both the UK and EU GDPR, profiling is defined as any automated processing of personal data to evaluate personal aspects such as predicting interests, behavior, or characteristics, such as economic status.

When profiling for tailored, direct marketing, brands should ensure to take the following steps:

  • Make sure the profiling is fair to customers by informing customers about the profiling with a clear explanation of your activities e.g. if you will use third parties to build their profile. The information held must also be accurate and not excessive.
  • Ensure a lawful basis for the profiling activity e.g. consent or legitimate interests.
  • Consider and effectively address any risk of discrimination as a result of the profiling for direct marketing.
  • Comply with any objection to direct marketing and profiling relating to direct marketing.

US

In the US, several states have enacted data privacy laws that impact consumer profiling by brands. By way of example, the California Privacy Rights Act explicitly defines “cross-context behavioral advertising” as the “targeting of advertising to a consumer based on the consumer’s personal information obtained from the consumer’s activity across businesses, distinctly-branded websites, applications, or services, other than the business, distinctly-branded website, application, or service with which the consumer intentionally interacts.” Under the California Privacy Rights Act, where a brand  sells or shares personal information or collects or uses sensitive personal information, businesses are required to provide individuals with a choice about how that data is used.  This is accomplished via a separate link to the “Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information” web page and a separate link to the “Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information”  web page, if applicable, or a statement that the business responds to and abides by opt-out preference signals sent by a platform, technology, or mechanism.

Other states are moving in this direction.  For example, in Virginia and Colorado, if a brand processes data for targeted advertising or consumer profiling, it must provide consumers with the right to opt-out.  Further, FTC scrutiny around discriminatory advertising and algorithmic bias is growing, especially in the luxury sector, where exclusivity can unintentionally result in exclusion.

Practical Tips for Luxury Brands

To continue delivering elevated experiences in the digital era, luxury brands must embed privacy and advertising compliance into their data and marketing strategies, including the following ways:

  • Map your data flows: understand what personal data is being transferred, where it goes and who processes it. Examples include customer data flows between regional e-commerce platforms and customer relationship management data flows from EU/UK stores to US headquarters.
  • Clearly explain in privacy notices how profiling works.
  • Ensure ad claims and targeting mechanisms do not result in discriminatory outcomes. For example, if a brand excludes certain demographics from luxury credit offers, this could breach the fairness principle of the GDPR if not properly explained and justified.
  • Offer customers granular controls over how their data is used for personalization, advertising, and sharing.
  • Ensure adtech vendors, influencer platforms, and customer relationship management platform providers comply with relevant data laws, especially when using tools that combine profiling and international transfers.

Data-driven personalization and global digital operations are essential to the bespoke services and exclusivity upon which luxury brands thrive, but they also attract intense regulatory scrutiny. By integrating robust privacy practices, and cross-border data safeguards, luxury brands can continue delivering aspirational customer journeys without compromising legal integrity.

Tags

United Kingdom (UK), General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Related Practices

Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions

Privacy

Trademark and Brand Management

Advertising

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Offices

London

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Nessa Khandaker
Associate
London
+44 (0)20 7864 2828
Email
Lynn Parker Dupree
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4462
Email

Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.

Related Insights

Conference

4th Global Patent Litigation FORUM

October 29, 2026

Munich

Conference

2026 EDTX Bench Bar Conference

October 28-30, 2026

Fort Worth

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California

October 19-20, 2026

San Francisco

Hybrid Conference

Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York

September 28-29, 2026

New York

Conference

2026 IPO Annual Meeting

September 27-29, 2026

Toronto

Conference

Georgia Life Sciences Summit 2026

August 25-26, 2026

Sandy Springs

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP