June 6, 2025

Luxury is intertwined with data. Whether it is curating private shopping events, offering exclusive perks, or delivering bespoke digital experiences, luxury brands increasingly rely on customer insights and seamless cross-border data flows. As luxury marketing becomes more data-driven, luxury brands must stay aware of their regulatory requirements.
International data transfers and personalization are two areas of key importance to our clients in the luxury space. Both issues are governed tightly in the UK under the UK GDPR, the EU under the EU GDPR and there are increasing issues to be aware of in the US under a patchwork of federal guidance and state laws.
This article explores how luxury brands can leverage personal data in compliance with legal frameworks across borders and technologies without compromising customer trust or risking violation of UK, EU and US regulations.
Luxury brands operate in a global ecosystem. By way of example, customer relationship management systems may be based in the US, with marketing operations in Europe, and e-commerce platforms serving customers across Asia and the Middle East. However, transferring personal data across borders, especially from the UK or EU to third countries requires careful consideration. We summarize some of those fundamental considerations below.
Under both the UK GDPR and EU GDPR, personal data cannot be transferred to third countries unless:
Additionally, brands in the UK or EU must perform either a UK transfer risk assessment or EU Transfer Impact Assessment to evaluate the legal risks in the recipient country before making a transfer. Brands therefore will have to make case by case assessments of whether the data being exported will receive a level of protection equivalent to the UK or EU GDPR, respectively.
Generally speaking, US laws do not impose restrictions on the transfer of personal information outside the USA. Notably however, US regulators note that whilst data can be freely exported, US protections still apply to personal data after it leaves the US.
US-based luxury brands should note that both the EU and the UK do not recognize the United States as offering GDPR adequacy unless certain circumstances exist. EU and UK GDPR adequacy is extended to commercial organizations participating in the EU-US Data Privacy Framework (and its UK extension). For brands, this means transfers of personal data may be made to US organizations certified under these frameworks without the need for transfer mechanisms such as standard contract clauses, or binding corporate rules.
Personalization is central to luxury marketing as brands use data to curate exclusive offers, predict preferences, and build long-term loyalty. But when these activities involve profiling or automated decision-making, they fall under regulatory scrutiny.
Under both the UK and EU GDPR, profiling is defined as any automated processing of personal data to evaluate personal aspects such as predicting interests, behavior, or characteristics, such as economic status.
When profiling for tailored, direct marketing, brands should ensure to take the following steps:
In the US, several states have enacted data privacy laws that impact consumer profiling by brands. By way of example, the California Privacy Rights Act explicitly defines “cross-context behavioral advertising” as the “targeting of advertising to a consumer based on the consumer’s personal information obtained from the consumer’s activity across businesses, distinctly-branded websites, applications, or services, other than the business, distinctly-branded website, application, or service with which the consumer intentionally interacts.” Under the California Privacy Rights Act, where a brand sells or shares personal information or collects or uses sensitive personal information, businesses are required to provide individuals with a choice about how that data is used. This is accomplished via a separate link to the “Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information” web page and a separate link to the “Limit the Use of My Sensitive Personal Information” web page, if applicable, or a statement that the business responds to and abides by opt-out preference signals sent by a platform, technology, or mechanism.
Other states are moving in this direction. For example, in Virginia and Colorado, if a brand processes data for targeted advertising or consumer profiling, it must provide consumers with the right to opt-out. Further, FTC scrutiny around discriminatory advertising and algorithmic bias is growing, especially in the luxury sector, where exclusivity can unintentionally result in exclusion.
To continue delivering elevated experiences in the digital era, luxury brands must embed privacy and advertising compliance into their data and marketing strategies, including the following ways:
Data-driven personalization and global digital operations are essential to the bespoke services and exclusivity upon which luxury brands thrive, but they also attract intense regulatory scrutiny. By integrating robust privacy practices, and cross-border data safeguards, luxury brands can continue delivering aspirational customer journeys without compromising legal integrity.
Copyright © Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm’s clients.
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – California
October 19-20, 2026
San Francisco
Hybrid Conference
Intellectual Property Law Institute 2026 – New York
September 28-29, 2026
New York
Webinar
Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights
July 15, 2026
Webinar
Webinar
Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches
July 8, 2026
Webinar
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.