April 16, 2015
Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal
The America Invents Act, signed into law on September 16, 2011, ushered in an array of patent reforms. One overlooked procedure, Supplemental Examination, seeks to purge putative instances of inequitable conduct prior to litigation by allowing patent owners to submit prior art and short statements to the USPTO after patent issuance. Few parties have used it. In this article, Finnegan attorneys Amanda K. Murphy and Jonathan R.K. Stroud analyze the law of inequitable conduct, explain the Supplemental Examination procedure, and discuss potential reasons for its lack of popularity among patent owners.
Originally printed in Buffalo Intellectual Property Law Journal. This article is for informational purposes, is not intended to constitute legal advice, and may be considered advertising under applicable state laws. This article is only the opinion of the authors and is not attributable to Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, or the firm's clients.
Webinar
Data and Market Exclusivity: An Update on China’s New Law and Comparisons to the US and Europe
November 19, 2026
Webinar
Seminar
The Augmented Practice 2026: Balancing AI Opportunity, Governance, and Risk
November 5, 2026
San Francisco
Articles
EPR Academy, Part 5 of 6: Special Considerations for Third-Party Requesters
October 14, 2026
Webinar
2026 Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches
October 14, 2026
Webinar
Articles
California Court Considers CIPA’s Application to Online Tracking as New Law Limits Private Actions
October 7, 2026
INCONTESTABLE® Blog
October 7, 2026
Seminar
October 1, 2026
Washington, DC
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.