直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Vidal Issues Non-Binding Guidance on Fintiv Denials

June 23, 2022

Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review

On June 21, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal released new guidance for discretionary denials for patent validity review at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Life Sciences IP Review interviewed Finnegan partner and former PTAB administrative patent judge Trenton Ward to discuss the USPTO memorandum.

Trenton explained the guidance provides clarification of the PTAB’s application of the Fintiv rule, but it is not binding on the PTAB. He stated, “The guidance specifically addresses one of the more controversial topics regarding the PTAB’s reliance on a district court’s scheduled trial date for Fintiv consideration. A district court’s scheduled trial date, by itself, is not a good indicator of whether the PTAB’s final written decision will be released before the district court trial.”

Trenton added that the guidance states parties may present “median time-to-trial for civil actions in the district court,” and the PTAB will examine “the speed with which the district court case may come to trial and be resolved.”

Read “Vidal Issues Non-Binding Guidance on Fintiv Denials”

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Fintiv

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Commentary

Justices to Side with Generic Drugmakers in Patent Spat, Attorneys Predict

May 5, 2026

Commentary

Supreme Court Takes Up Generic Drug Labeling Fight

April 29, 2026

Press Release

Pvtech Secures Stay of New Jersey District Court Litigation Following USPTO Institution of All 10 Ex Parte Reexamination Requests Against Patents Asserted by Jiaxing Super Lighting

April 28, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP