直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Vidal Issues Non-Binding Guidance on Fintiv Denials

June 23, 2022

Life Sciences Intellectual Property Review

On June 21, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) Director Kathi Vidal released new guidance for discretionary denials for patent validity review at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Life Sciences IP Review interviewed Finnegan partner and former PTAB administrative patent judge Trenton Ward to discuss the USPTO memorandum.

Trenton explained the guidance provides clarification of the PTAB’s application of the Fintiv rule, but it is not binding on the PTAB. He stated, “The guidance specifically addresses one of the more controversial topics regarding the PTAB’s reliance on a district court’s scheduled trial date for Fintiv consideration. A district court’s scheduled trial date, by itself, is not a good indicator of whether the PTAB’s final written decision will be released before the district court trial.”

Trenton added that the guidance states parties may present “median time-to-trial for civil actions in the district court,” and the PTAB will examine “the speed with which the district court case may come to trial and be resolved.”

Read “Vidal Issues Non-Binding Guidance on Fintiv Denials”

Tags

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), Fintiv

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Bloomberg Law Q&A with Finnegan IP Lawyer Christian Hurt

September 11, 2026

Commentary

Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge

September 11, 2026

Commentary

WNBA’s Hope for a ‘The W’ Trademark Rides on a Three-Letter Word

August 31, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP