April 28, 2020
Intellectual Property Magazine
In Georgia v. Public.Resource.org, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that the state of Georgia does not own the copyright to annotations in its state law codes. Intellectual Property Magazine contacted Finnegan partner Brett Heavner for his thoughts on how the decision will impact legal publishers.
Brett said, “If no one owns copyright in the code annotations/commentaries, legal publishers will have difficulty generating income from the commentaries. While in theory the private legal publishers could preserve the copyright in the code annotations/commentaries by authoring them independently (and thereby stay within the protection of Callaghan v Myers), authorship and distribution could be cumbersome without the cooperation of state legislatures.”
Read the full article here.
Commentary
Permanent Injunction Granted to USA Weightlifting Inc., Enjoining Use of Protected Marks
April 24, 2026
Commentary
Finnegan’s New AI Practice Is a Project in ‘Interdisciplinary’ Expertise
September 12, 2025
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.