直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

‘SoniStream’ Mark Does Not Survive a Dilution Opposition Brought by Sony

November 2, 2022

IP Law Daily

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled in favor of Sony Group Corporation in an opposition against an application for the trademark “SoniStream” for goods identified as “downloadable computer software for Internet and broadcast radio scheduling and audio playout”. Sony opposed the application based on likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act as well as dilution under Section 43(c) of the Trademark Act.

The Board sustained the opposition on dilution grounds, finding SONY to be famous among the general U.S. public.  In evaluating whether “SoniStream” is sufficiently similar to SONY, one of the key issues was how “SoniStream” is pronounced. While the Board noted there were multiple possible pronunciations, it found based on Sony’s expert linguistic evidence that pronunciation as “SONY-stream” was a reasonable possibility that should be considered. The Board also found that the marks were sufficiently similar in appearance such that “SoniStream” would immediately conjure up the famous SONY mark.

Read “‘SoniStream’ Mark Does Not Survive a Dilution Opposition Brought by Sony”

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Communications

Media

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email
Naresh Kilaru
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4236
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award

May 13, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Award/Ranking

61 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized on the 2025 Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll

May 7, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP