直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

‘SoniStream’ Mark Does Not Survive a Dilution Opposition Brought by Sony

November 2, 2022

IP Law Daily

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ruled in favor of Sony Group Corporation in an opposition against an application for the trademark “SoniStream” for goods identified as “downloadable computer software for Internet and broadcast radio scheduling and audio playout”. Sony opposed the application based on likelihood of confusion under Section 2(d) of the Trademark Act as well as dilution under Section 43(c) of the Trademark Act.

The Board sustained the opposition on dilution grounds, finding SONY to be famous among the general U.S. public.  In evaluating whether “SoniStream” is sufficiently similar to SONY, one of the key issues was how “SoniStream” is pronounced. While the Board noted there were multiple possible pronunciations, it found based on Sony’s expert linguistic evidence that pronunciation as “SONY-stream” was a reasonable possibility that should be considered. The Board also found that the marks were sufficiently similar in appearance such that “SoniStream” would immediately conjure up the famous SONY mark.

Read “‘SoniStream’ Mark Does Not Survive a Dilution Opposition Brought by Sony”

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Communications

Media

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email
Naresh Kilaru
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4236
Email

Related News

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named a Finalist for The American Lawyer 2026 Industry Awards

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Climbs Two Spots on The American Lawyer’s 2026: A-List Runners Up

August 12, 2026

Commentary

UK Patent Document Access Rules Raise Secrecy Concerns

August 12, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP