Home exercise bike company Peloton filed a petition at the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB), stating that Mad Dogg’s SPIN and SPINNING trademarks are generic terms in the stationary bike industry and therefore cannot be enforced. World Trademark Review contacted Finnegan partner Mark Sommers for his thoughts on the case.
Mark said, “Assuming that trademark rights in SPIN and SPINNING are upheld for the products and services at issue, those rights will nevertheless be inadequate to prevent continued industry use of the words “spin” and “spinning” in their ordinary dictionary sense (and in a non-misleading manner) under the fair use laws. Given that the repetitive rotation of a rider’s legs when pedalling a bicycle’s drive train is often referred to as “spinning,” as in to engage or “spin” the bicycle’s crank arms, that use will continue to remain freely available to the industry. Clearly, the more interesting issue will be how the evidentiary record is exercised, the facts are spun, and the arguments peddled.”
Read the full article here.
Press Release
Finnegan Named a “True Trailblazer” for Its Continued Commitment to Mansfield Certification Process
August 16, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.