直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

PTAB Post-SAS: What We Know and What Questions Remain

June 19, 2018

Managing Intellectual Property

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu, questions still remain regarding how institution rates will change, how practice in front of the PTAB will evolve, and how district courts and the Federal Circuit will react. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Trenton Ward for his thoughts. 

Trenton said, "APJs now have a new tool for denial that was not previously used. You can argue whether or not they had discretion to do it previously, but certainly it wasn’t the practice of panels to decide to not institute a case simply because there were more grounds that didn’t reach the reasonable likelihood threshold as opposed to grounds that did meet it. I think we are in a new framework now."

He believes institution rates will slightly decrease. He said, "We have seen a downwards trend. My estimation is we are going to see another few percentage points, we may get into the 50s but not into the 40 percentile range or anything like that. The APJs now have the ability to do denials in situations where they may not previously have done, so we will see slightly more denials of institution.”

Tags

SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Commentary

Quince Aims to Have ‘Dupe’ Evidence Shape Ugg Shoe Patent Trial

May 26, 2026

Commentary

New Appellate Opinion in Amazon Biometric Data Case May Signal ‘Narrowing’ Scope of BIPA Litigation, Experts Say

May 20, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination

May 11, 2026

Commentary

ITC Bars Import of Innoscience Chips Made Before Redesign

May 8, 2026

Commentary

How Litigation Funding Disclosure Could Affect ITC Cases

May 7 , 2026

Award/Ranking

Associates Rank Finnegan “Best of the Best” in BTI Associate Satisfaction Survey

May 7, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Wins IP Firm of the Year at the 2026 LSPN Awards

May 1, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP