直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

PTAB Post-SAS: What We Know and What Questions Remain

June 19, 2018

Managing Intellectual Property

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu, questions still remain regarding how institution rates will change, how practice in front of the PTAB will evolve, and how district courts and the Federal Circuit will react. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Trenton Ward for his thoughts. 

Trenton said, "APJs now have a new tool for denial that was not previously used. You can argue whether or not they had discretion to do it previously, but certainly it wasn’t the practice of panels to decide to not institute a case simply because there were more grounds that didn’t reach the reasonable likelihood threshold as opposed to grounds that did meet it. I think we are in a new framework now."

He believes institution rates will slightly decrease. He said, "We have seen a downwards trend. My estimation is we are going to see another few percentage points, we may get into the 50s but not into the 40 percentile range or anything like that. The APJs now have the ability to do denials in situations where they may not previously have done, so we will see slightly more denials of institution.”

Tags

SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Wins 2026 Excellence in Construction Award for Washington, DC Office Renovation

September 25, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP