June 19, 2018
Managing Intellectual Property
Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu, questions still remain regarding how institution rates will change, how practice in front of the PTAB will evolve, and how district courts and the Federal Circuit will react. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Trenton Ward for his thoughts.
Trenton said, "APJs now have a new tool for denial that was not previously used. You can argue whether or not they had discretion to do it previously, but certainly it wasn’t the practice of panels to decide to not institute a case simply because there were more grounds that didn’t reach the reasonable likelihood threshold as opposed to grounds that did meet it. I think we are in a new framework now."
He believes institution rates will slightly decrease. He said, "We have seen a downwards trend. My estimation is we are going to see another few percentage points, we may get into the 50s but not into the 40 percentile range or anything like that. The APJs now have the ability to do denials in situations where they may not previously have done, so we will see slightly more denials of institution.”
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers
June 22, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case
June 15, 2026
Award/Ranking
World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List
June 24, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.