直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Media Mention

PTAB Post-SAS: What We Know and What Questions Remain

June 19, 2018

Managing Intellectual Property

Following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in SAS Institute v. Iancu, questions still remain regarding how institution rates will change, how practice in front of the PTAB will evolve, and how district courts and the Federal Circuit will react. Managing Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Trenton Ward for his thoughts. 

Trenton said, "APJs now have a new tool for denial that was not previously used. You can argue whether or not they had discretion to do it previously, but certainly it wasn’t the practice of panels to decide to not institute a case simply because there were more grounds that didn’t reach the reasonable likelihood threshold as opposed to grounds that did meet it. I think we are in a new framework now."

He believes institution rates will slightly decrease. He said, "We have seen a downwards trend. My estimation is we are going to see another few percentage points, we may get into the 50s but not into the 40 percentile range or anything like that. The APJs now have the ability to do denials in situations where they may not previously have done, so we will see slightly more denials of institution.”

Tags

SAS Institute Inc. v. Iancu, Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB)

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

Related Offices

Atlanta, GA

Related News

Commentary

Levi’s Has Filed 2 New Lawsuits This Year to Protect Its Red Tab Trademark

July 9, 2026

Commentary

‘Oyez, Oyez.’ Supreme Court’s Last Official Crier Dies at 102

July 8, 2026

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Commentary

U.S. Judge Rules Forum-Selection Clause Bars Zync from Pursuing ITC Trade Secret Case

June 15, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in the 2026 Legal 500 U.S. Guide

June 10, 2026

Award/Ranking

World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List

June 24, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP