Practical Law The Journal interviewed Joshua Goldberg about the recent surge in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) discretionary denials of patent challenges in deference to fast-moving, parallel district court or International Trade Commission (ITC) proceedings. This growing trend stems from the PTAB’s May 2020 opinion in Apple Inc. v. Fintiv, Inc., in which the PTAB established the factors it weighs when exercising its statutory discretion to deny inter partes review (IPR) of patents due to parallel proceedings. Joshua provided tips for companies planning to enforce patents as well as companies concerned with impending infringement accusations. He also cautions that a past IPR denial does not necessarily preclude potential future challenges.
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.