直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Parties Must Tell PTAB of Key Developments in Parallel Proceedings

September 26, 2025

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has issued a general order requiring parties to promptly disclose relevant updates from parallel litigation. The move, which affects hundreds of inter partes and post-grant review proceedings, is seen by practitioners as a strategic effort to ensure consistency and transparency in decision-making.

Finnegan partner Forrest Jones emphasized the importance of the order for administrative patent judges with IAM by stating that, “They need to pay attention to what's going on in the parallel cases and specifically address them if they think that there could be any conflict.”

Forrest also noted the broader implications of the PTAB’s approach.

“All of this might have to do with the PTAB trying to insulate itself for appeals, giving explicit reasons why their decision is not inconsistent with whatever happened in a parallel litigation or if it is inconsistent, why they are right and the parallel litigation is wrong.”

To further highlight the practical impact of the policy on parties involved in proceedings, Forrest added, “If you file a petition, there is a Markman hearing that happens after the PTAB has instituted the IPR. Whoever wins or loses on a particular term is probably going to want to get that evidence of decision in front of the PTAB and argue that they should be making the same decision.”

Read “Parties Must Tell PTAB of Key Developments in Parallel Proceedings”

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Forrest A. Jones
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4019
Email

Related News

Commentary

Levi’s Has Filed 2 New Lawsuits This Year to Protect Its Red Tab Trademark

July 9, 2026

Commentary

‘Oyez, Oyez.’ Supreme Court’s Last Official Crier Dies at 102

July 8, 2026

Award/Ranking

Best Lawyers in Germany Recognizes Dr. Dr. Jochen Herr in Recent Rankings

July 16, 2026

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Commentary

BMW Secures Injunction Forcing Zync to Seek Stay of ITC Trade Secret Case

June 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP