直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

Parties Must Tell PTAB of Key Developments in Parallel Proceedings

September 26, 2025

Intellectual Asset Management (IAM)

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) has issued a general order requiring parties to promptly disclose relevant updates from parallel litigation. The move, which affects hundreds of inter partes and post-grant review proceedings, is seen by practitioners as a strategic effort to ensure consistency and transparency in decision-making.

Finnegan partner Forrest Jones emphasized the importance of the order for administrative patent judges with IAM by stating that, “They need to pay attention to what's going on in the parallel cases and specifically address them if they think that there could be any conflict.”

Forrest also noted the broader implications of the PTAB’s approach.

“All of this might have to do with the PTAB trying to insulate itself for appeals, giving explicit reasons why their decision is not inconsistent with whatever happened in a parallel litigation or if it is inconsistent, why they are right and the parallel litigation is wrong.”

To further highlight the practical impact of the policy on parties involved in proceedings, Forrest added, “If you file a petition, there is a Markman hearing that happens after the PTAB has instituted the IPR. Whoever wins or loses on a particular term is probably going to want to get that evidence of decision in front of the PTAB and argue that they should be making the same decision.”

Read “Parties Must Tell PTAB of Key Developments in Parallel Proceedings”

Related Practices

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Forrest A. Jones
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4019
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Media Mention

Law360's Legal Lions of the Week: Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP