May 2, 2018
Bloomberg Law
On May 1, 2018 a district court ruled in favor of Finnegan client Valeant Pharmaceuticals, ruling that defendants Mylan and Actavis were unable to prove a patent on Valeant's Relistor drug is invalid due to obviousness. The court said, "[t]he bottom line is that Defendants have pointed to no evidence that claim 8 was either an 'identified, predictable solution' or an 'anticipated success.'"
Commentary
January 20, 2023
Press Release
Finnegan Earns Law360’s Practice Group of the Year for Intellectual Property
January 18, 2023
Announcement
Finnegan Partner Leslie McDonell Named a Global Leader by Intellectual Asset Management
January 5, 2023
Commentary
All I Want for IP in 2023: Kicking off the New Year with the IP Community’s Wildest Dreams
January 2, 2023
Due to international data regulations, we’ve recently updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
The Finnegan UPC Hub is a one-stop shop for our insights related to the Unified Patent Court (UPC).