直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

How BMW Made Sure It Never Heard from One NPE Again

June 2, 2023

Managing Intellectual Property

Receiving a patent infringement claim from a non-practicing entity (NPE) can be handled in a variety of ways. Businesses can choose to pay for a license, or they can simply fight the NPE, both in federal courts and by filing petitions at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB).

In rare cases, businesses can secure covenants asking NPEs not to sue and agreeing not to file any more suits. Finnegan was able to secure such an agreement from NPE Stragent for its client BMW recently.

Finnegan partner Lionel Lavenue told Managing Intellectual Property that, “After the last two rounds of litigation, Stragent continued to return, again and again, to the USPTO to obtain additional patents to assert against BMW and others.”

He noted that the automotive company had filed invalidity counterclaims and inter partes review petitions against Stragent. Additionally, Lionel said that there was also a risk of the NPE having to pay BMW’s attorney fees based on its litigation conduct.

“As a result, BMW had leverage to demand resolution in the form of a covenant not to sue ever again. Once the strength of BMW’s case and its negotiation stance was clear, Stragent had little choice but to acquiesce,” he said.

According to Lionel, negotiations with Stragent started quickly after a positive hearing for BMW this year in the District of Delaware.

“As a result of BMW’s litigation strategy and strong positions, Stragent had to concede that it could not survive summary judgment,” he said.

Lionel adds that BMW assured that the covenant wouldn’t be confidential very early in the negotiation process.

“BMW wanted to underscore that it does not take kindly to demands to license technology that it is not using, and thus will challenge erroneous assertions of patent rights,” he said.

“Once BMW made clear that publicity was a non-negotiable condition of the agreement, Stragent acceded.”

This was a wonderful outcome according to Lionel, who also said that the firm would explore executing similar agreements for other clients. He adds that the firm was fortunate to have BMW’s support for the plan, as it was the “only and best available option.”

Read “How BMW Made Sure It Never Heard from One NPE Again”

Tags

non-practicing entity (NPE)

Related Practices

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Patent Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Transportation and Logistics

Automotive and Smart Mobility Tech

Related Offices

Reston, VA

Related Professionals

Lionel M. Lavenue
Partner
Reston, VA
+1 571 203 2750
Email

Related News

Press Release

Ninth Circuit Denies Zync’s Emergency Motion to Stay; BMW’s Preliminary Injunction Remains in Full Effect, ITC Stay Expected to Continue

July 23, 2026

Commentary

PTAB Filings Down 81% in Q2 2026 as Patent Challengers Abandon IPR Playbook

July 13, 2026

Commentary

SCOTUS to Rule on Pepsi Win, Trademark Enforcement Changes Could Follow

July 13, 2026

Commentary

Levi’s Has Filed 2 New Lawsuits This Year to Protect Its Red Tab Trademark

July 9, 2026

Commentary

‘Oyez, Oyez.’ Supreme Court’s Last Official Crier Dies at 102

July 8, 2026

Commentary

Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects

June 30, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings

June 25, 2026

Commentary

Zync Fights Block of ITC Trade Secret Case Against BMW

June 24, 2026

Press Release

BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret

June 23, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP