June 2, 2014
On June 2, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc., determining “the phrases ‘amenable to construction’ and ‘insolubly ambiguous’ for purposes of identifying an indefinite patent claim are ’lack precision’.” Finnegan partner James R. Barney said, “All patents in all areas of technology could be susceptible to indefiniteness challenges depending on how the Federal Circuit applies the new Nautilus test.”
Press Release
August 19, 2026
Press Release
August 18, 2026
Commentary
U.S. Trademark Owners Turn to "Schedule A" as Blocking Bills Bypass Counterfeiting
August 5, 2026
Commentary
BMW Uses Forum-Selection Clause to Shut Down ITC Trade Secret Investigation
July 31, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.