December 11, 2014
On December 4, 2014, the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in Apple Inc. v. Samsung Elecs. Co. Bloomberg BNA contacted Finnegan attorney Elizabeth D. Ferrill to provide comment on the scope of the coverage of Apple's design patents and the amount of damages that can be expected. Ferrillnoted that while counsel did not disagree the patents at issue each covered “a slice of the iPhone,” they did disagree on the impact the “functional elements” of design would have on “the overall impression of the claimed ornamental features." Ferrill also noted “an uphill battle” with regard to Samsung’s damages argument.
Award/Ranking
June 5, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked
May 28, 2026
Commentary
May 20, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Partner Antje Brambrink Shortlisted for Women in Business Law EMEA Award
May 13, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Decisive ITC Victory for Innoscience in Final Determination
May 11, 2026
Award/Ranking
Associates Rank Finnegan “Best of the Best” in BTI Associate Satisfaction Survey
May 7, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.