June 21, 2017
Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property
In Matal v. Tam, the U.S. Supreme Court decided that banning disparaging trademarks is unconstitutional and violates the First Amendment of freedom of speech. The result of this case provides further guidance for Pro-Football Inc. v. Blackhorse, a case where the Washington Redskins football team is seeking protection of the trademarks covering the team's name. Westlaw Journal Intellectual Property contacted Finnegan attorney Mark Sommers for his predictions on the outcome of the Redskins trademark dispute as a result of the Matal v. Tam decision.
Sommers said, "The new arbiter over all things disparaging is the court of public opinion, where merchants seeking to exploit the source-identifying function of disparaging words must balance such use against the inherent potential and risk of commercial alienation, blowback and public outrage. The "Redskins" mark will again appear on federal register."
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Award/Ranking
Managing IP Americas Awards 2024: Finnegan Shortlisted for Nine Awards, Including Firm of the Year
March 12, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.