On June 24, 2019, in its decision on Iancu v. Brunetti, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Lanham Act’s ban on offensive trademark registrations, ruling that the ban violates the First Amendment. While the dissenting opinion suggests there may be a “rush” to register such trademarks, many IP practitioners don’t believe the push for profane or scandalous marks will be that drastic and that those trademark applications will still have a difficult time becoming registered. Law360 contacted Finnegan attorney Mark Sommers for his thoughts on the case.
Mark said, “Simply emblazoning a phrase on the front of T-shirt does not make it a trademark. This ruling will probably lead to stricter examination of whether these particular terms are being used as indicators of source, as opposed to mere expressions, as opposed to simple vulgarity."
Commentary
Patent Strategy Could Shape Financing, Valuation and Risk in Offshore Energy Projects
June 30, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan’s European Practices and Attorneys Highlighted in 2026 Managing IP Rankings
June 25, 2026
Press Release
BMW Obtains Preliminary Injunction Against Zync; Federal Court Orders Zync to Halt ITC Trade Secret
June 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List
June 24, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.