直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

A 'Rush' of Offensive Trademarks? Maybe Not

June 25, 2019

Law360

On June 24, 2019, in its decision on Iancu v. Brunetti, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Lanham Act’s ban on offensive trademark registrations, ruling that the ban violates the First Amendment. While the dissenting opinion suggests there may be a “rush” to register such trademarks, many IP practitioners don’t believe the push for profane or scandalous marks will be that drastic and that those trademark applications will still have a difficult time becoming registered. Law360 contacted Finnegan attorney Mark Sommers for his thoughts on the case. 

Mark said, “Simply emblazoning a phrase on the front of T-shirt does not make it a trademark. This ruling will probably lead to stricter examination of whether these particular terms are being used as indicators of source, as opposed to mere expressions, as opposed to simple vulgarity."

Tags

Lanham Act, Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS), Iancu v. Brunetti

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Litigation and Trials

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Mark Sommers
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4064
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP