On June 24, 2019, in its decision on Iancu v. Brunetti, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Lanham Act’s ban on offensive trademark registrations, ruling that the ban violates the First Amendment. While the dissenting opinion suggests there may be a “rush” to register such trademarks, many IP practitioners don’t believe the push for profane or scandalous marks will be that drastic and that those trademark applications will still have a difficult time becoming registered. Law360 contacted Finnegan attorney Mark Sommers for his thoughts on the case.
Mark said, “Simply emblazoning a phrase on the front of T-shirt does not make it a trademark. This ruling will probably lead to stricter examination of whether these particular terms are being used as indicators of source, as opposed to mere expressions, as opposed to simple vulgarity."
Media Mention
Women in Business Law Americas Awards 2024: Three Finnegan Attorneys Shortlisted
April 7, 2024
Press Release
Finnegan and BMW Group Successfully Demolish Non-Practicing Entity NorthStar’s Efforts
April 3, 2024
Award/Ranking
Managing IP Americas Awards 2024: Finnegan Shortlisted for Nine Awards, Including Firm of the Year
March 12, 2024
Commentary
February 29, 2024
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.