On June 24, 2019, in its decision on Iancu v. Brunetti, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the Lanham Act’s ban on offensive trademark registrations, ruling that the ban violates the First Amendment. While the dissenting opinion suggests there may be a “rush” to register such trademarks, many IP practitioners don’t believe the push for profane or scandalous marks will be that drastic and that those trademark applications will still have a difficult time becoming registered. Law360 contacted Finnegan attorney Mark Sommers for his thoughts on the case.
Mark said, “Simply emblazoning a phrase on the front of T-shirt does not make it a trademark. This ruling will probably lead to stricter examination of whether these particular terms are being used as indicators of source, as opposed to mere expressions, as opposed to simple vulgarity."
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.