直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Commentary

50 Years After Pioneering Vaginal Care Branding, Combe Fends Off Similar Competing Trademark

April 9, 2021

HBW Insight

The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) agreed with Vagisil feminine care product marketer Combe Inc. that Marke Enterprises LLC’s proposed trademark VAGISERT for its vaginal antifungal preparation would cause marketplace confusion and its registration should be rejected. Finnegan attorneys Douglas Rettew, Anna Naydonov, and Sydney English represented Combe and stated that the TTAB decision recognizes the marketplace power of a popular brand like Vagisil as well as Combe’s Vagistat brand. They said:

“This decision shows that the TTAB recognizes the commercial magnetism of brands like Vagisil and Vagistat and the harm that can arise from similar marks, like Vagisert. It also shows that, when one can prove that a brand is legally ‘famous,’ as Combe did here for Vagisil, the TTAB will afford that mark a wide and broad scope of protection. Like all trademark owners, OTC drug manufacturers should federally register their important brands (although that’s not required to assert rights) and should establish and follow a robust enforcement program to challenge and stop similar marks."

Read "50 Years After Pioneering Vaginal Care Branding, Combe Fends Off Similar Competing Trademark"

Tags

likelihood of confusion

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Trademark Oppositions and Cancellations

Related Industries

Consumer Goods and Services

Consumer Products

Related Offices

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP