Partner
Elliot Cook maintains a diverse intellectual property practice, including patent litigation, post-grant patent challenges, strategic patent prosecution and portfolio development, and patent monetization.
Elliot devotes a significant amount of his practice to helping clients strategically develop patent portfolios that effectively block competitors and build corporate value. He works closely with clients to ensure that their patents align with and advance their business goals, thereby optimizing value and minimizing cost.
Elliot serves on the faculty at the University of Virginia Law School Trial Advocacy Institute. Based on his involvement in more than 50 patent litigations, Elliot has significant experience both defending against and asserting patent rights. His litigation experience ranges from early dispositive motions through trying a case before a jury, including both written and oral advocacy.
Elliot’s practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) includes post-grant proceedings and patent prosecution. He has worked on more than 40 inter partes review (IPR) matters, representing both petitioners and patent owners, as well as several ex parte and inter partes reexamination matters. He maintains an active patent prosecution practice, securing patent rights for both startups and established market leaders. Elliot has assisted clients with patent licensing, patent monetization strategy, and patent sales ranging in value from approximately $20 million to more than $1 billion.
Scramoge Technology Limited v. Volkswagen AG, et al.
2-22-cv-10730, E.D. Mich.
IPR2022-01309, -01354, -01543, -01559, PTAB, Judges Easthom, Kalan, Lee, McNamara, Moore, Wormmeester
Arigna Technology Limited v. Volkswagen AG, et al.
337-TA-1267, ITC, Judge Bhattacharyya
IPR2021-01321, -01531, PTAB, Judges Baer, Fenick, Iftikhar
2:21-cv-00054; -00172, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
Intellectual Ventures II LLC v. FedEx Corp.
2:16-cv-00980, E.D. Tex., Judge Gilstrap
Rolls-Royce v. United Technologies Corp.
Defended United Technologies Corp. in a patent infringement action concerning swept fan blades for ducted gas turbine engines used on contemporary commercial and private aircraft, resulting in a favorable summary judgment ruling of noninfringement in favor of UTC.
1:10-cv-00457, E.D. Va., Judges Anderson, Brinkema
Trover Group, Inc. v. Axis Communications
Represented Axis in defense of patent suit relating to network video technologies.
2:13-cv-01047, E.D. Tex., Judges Bryson, Gilstrap
IPR2015-00432, PTAB, Judges Chen, Crumbley, Plenzler
Finnegan assists AOL in achieving $1.056 billion patent deal
Assisted AOL in achieving a $1.056 billion patent deal with Microsoft, advising with respect to strategic planning, negotiations, and closing; member of Finnegan prosecution team that worked closely with AOL to strategically build and strengthen patent portfolio in furtherance of monetization goals.
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026 IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in March and April 2026
May 26, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for December 2025 - February 2026 Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for December 2025 - February 2026
March 31, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in November 2025 to January 2026 IPR and PGR Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in November 2025 to January 2026
March 6, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for September-November 2025 Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for September-November 2025
December 30, 2025
Media Mention
Fed. Circ. Chief Feels 'Bright-Line Rule Coming' for IP Marking Fed. Circ. Chief Feels 'Bright-Line Rule Coming' for IP Marking
April 9, 2026
Law360Media Mention
Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct Federal Circuit Grills Sanctioned Patent Lawyer Over Conduct
April 9, 2026
Bloomberg LawMedia Mention
Asserted Claims of Fleet Vehicle Tracking Patent Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Asserted Claims of Fleet Vehicle Tracking Patent Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101
March 31, 2026
Docket NavigatorMedia Mention
Patent for Vehicle Tracking and Control System Directed to Ineligible Subject Matter Patent for Vehicle Tracking and Control System Directed to Ineligible Subject Matter
March 30, 2026
IP Law DailyMedia Mention
Roman War Analogy Unravels Patent Used Against Audi, Tech Firms Roman War Analogy Unravels Patent Used Against Audi, Tech Firms
March 27, 2026
Bloomberg LawMedia Mention
Judge Lends Ear to Audi's Caesar Analogy to End Patent Suit Judge Lends Ear to Audi's Caesar Analogy to End Patent Suit
March 26, 2026
Law360Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.