直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

營業秘密

About

您的創新是多元的,保護方式也應如此。理解營業秘密的全方位價值。

當今全球經濟中,激烈的競爭、員工的異動、企業分拆和新創產業的激增,使營業秘密的保護極為關鍵。然而從智財的角度來看,企業用來將突破性產品導入市場的公式、設備、技術、模式、流程、數據彙編、和方法常常被忽視。最近的頭條新聞證實了,企業之營業秘密遭競爭對手和國家盜用侵害構成之威脅,並且據報導,營業秘密盜用的判決與和解金額動輒達數億甚至數十億美金。這些發展皆顯示,營業秘密未來仍舊是企業智財策略的根基。

飛翰的營業秘密業務多半牽涉複雜技術的案件。對於以技術為主力之產業提供智財策略諮詢,我們已有數十年的經驗,並經常承接「公司成敗在此一役」的訴訟案。我們擁有深厚的技術專長,包括65多名擁有從神經生物學到電機工程等學科之博士學位的專業人員,成為涉及專業技術之營業秘密案件提供諮詢和提起訴訟上的精實後盾。我們能夠和工程師與科學家們做緊密高效的合作,解決獨特的營業秘密爭議,例如獨立研發、逆向工程、與技術水平。

為您珍貴的營業秘密奠定穩固的基礎

飛翰為財富500強和全球1000大企業,及各行各業的新創公司和組織提供全面的營業秘密保護和諮詢服務。我們與每個客戶的法務、業務、與技術人員密切合作,協助他們挖掘出創新或技術的關鍵要素,確保這些關鍵要素能透過營業秘密的保護而獲益。我們也密切注意那些類型的數據資訊可能需要專利或著作權的保護,或透過各種形式的保密和競業禁止協議取得保護。

營業秘密的調查和案件往往進展迅速,從問題出現那一刻起,速度的掌控是防止秘密丟失或控制損害的關鍵,這正是飛翰可提供獨特優勢之處。我們能立即為每個案件投入全面的法律和技術資源,如有訴訟之必要,對技術的深入理解,使我們能夠擬定具說服力和有效的策略,以迅速解決問題。

當有必要透過訴訟保護客戶的營業秘密或應對來自競爭對手的挑戰時,我們專長出庭辯護的律師利用在美國聯邦和州法院數十年的經驗協助客戶。營業秘密訴訟案在程序上有其獨特挑戰性,我們在訴訟過程中處理單方與初步禁制令、證據揭示的管控、透過裁定請求獲得之救濟,以及營業秘密的維護上都有優良的實績。

飛翰提供和營業秘密有關的全面服務

  • 承接向州法院、聯邦法院、國際貿易委員會、與仲裁機關提起之營業秘密遭盜用的訴訟案
  • 對營業秘密遭盜用侵害進行內部稽核與調查
  • 識別確認可受保護的營業秘密
  • 審查保密與保全的方法
  • 制定新的安全措施,防止非法盜用或揭露
  • 擬定與員工和第三方的適當保密合約
  • 為員工提供訓練講習,灌輸保密的必要性
  • 制定保護可能不符合營業秘密保護條件之機密商業資訊的保護方法

Everyone in this practice

Experience

Eastman Chemical Company & Others v. Covr Group Limited & Another
Finnegan represented Eastman Chemical Company, an independent global specialty materials company, and several of its subsidiaries in a UK dispute concerning copyright infringement, trade secret misappropriation, and breach of contract before the UK High Court. The dispute centered on a proprietary database of patterns used in automotive paint protection film. The parties reached a confidential settlement and the Defendants agreed not to infringe Eastman intellectual property rights in the future.

IL-2024-000026, UK High Court

Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Beard et al.

Represented Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in district court litigation involving claims of trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract against corporate and individual defendants relating to complex treatments for genetic disorders. Obtained successful outcome including permanent injunction and other remedies against all defendants.

3:24-cv-02170, D. Or., Judge Simon

Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Lexeo Therapeutics, Inc., et al.

Represented Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in district court litigation involving claims of trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract against individual and corporate defendants and relating to complex treatments for genetic disorders. Successfully opposed motion to dismiss key claims and obtained settlement with all defendants following completion of fact discovery.

1:23-cv-09000, S.D.N.Y., Judges Castel, Aaron

 Arvinas Operations, Inc. et al. v. Qian et al.

Defending Accutar Biotechnology, Inc. in a trade secret lawsuit brought by Arvinas regarding alleged trade secrets concerning breast cancer therapies.

3:22-cv-00717, D. Conn., Judges Chatigny, Richardson

Trade secret and breach of contract dispute resolved with favorable settlement for Finnegan client Meati Foods

Finnegan represented Emergy, Inc., d/b/a Meati Foods in a trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and correction of inventorship case against The Better Meat Company (BMC) and Augustus Pattillo involving alternative meat made from mycelium.

Emergy alleged that Augustus Pattillo stole its trade secrets on the cultivation and production of mycelium that he learned while working as a lab technician for Emergy’s founders, misused them in his work with BMC, breached his nondisclosure agreement with Emergy, and improperly filed patent applications on Emergy’s technology and assigned them to BMC.

BMC filed claims of tortious interference and unfair competition against Emergy, which Emergy succeeded in striking under California’s anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) statute. After prevailing under the anti-SLAPP statute, Emergy was statutorily entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for defending against BMC’s stricken claims of tortious interference and unfair competition

Early in the litigation, Emergy defeated BMC’s motion to dismiss Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation and breach of implied contract claims. Emergy later defeated BMC’s motion for summary judgment on Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and breach of implied contract claims. The case settled soon after the Court issued its summary judgment ruling.

2-21-cv-02338, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
2-21-cv-02417, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller

Bright Data Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd.

Represented NetNut in litigation in the Eastern District of Texas against Bright Data, related to Bright Data’s patents and trade secrets involving proxy server technology. The case resulted in a favorable dismissal for the client.

2:20-cv-00188, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne

More

Insights

Conference

WIPR Trade Secrets West

May 28, 2026

San Jose

Conference

IPOwners Spring Summit 2026

March 18-19,2026

Washington

Conference

IAM Live: Trade Secret Strategy Europe 2026

February 25, 2026

London

Conference

Korea IP Forum

February 3, 2026

Seoul

Articles

How the Timing of Hypothetical Negotiation Can Lead to a Higher Premium for Exclusivity

How the Timing of Hypothetical Negotiation Can Lead to a Higher Premium for Exclusivity

December/January 2026

Lecture

Introduction to Trade Secrets

January 26, 2026

Seattle

More

News

Press Release

Finnegan Enhances Its German and European IP Practice with Björn Kalbfus

April 30, 2026

Commentary

What xAI’s Challenge to California’s Generative AI Disclosure Law Means for Trade Secrets

January 6, 2026

Commentary

Top Trade Secrets Decisions of 2025

December 18, 2025

Commentary

The Beauty Founder’s Guide to Getting a Patent

July 17, 2025

Award/Ranking

World IP Review Lists Finnegan in Its 2024 Global Trade Secrets Rankings 

October 3, 2024

Award/Ranking

Four Finnegan Partners Named 2024 Rising Stars by Managing Intellectual Property

September 30, 2024

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP