直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • Federal Circuit IP Blog
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First Blog
  • Events & Webinars
  • IP Updates
  • Podcasts
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Seminar

What is Still Patentable? Understanding the New Patentable Subject Matter Guidelines, and the Impact of the AIA Post-Grant Proceedings

November 18, 2014

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Following the Alice, Mayo, Prometheus, and Myriad court decisions in the U.S., everyone has been watching closely to see the breadth of impact these cases would have on their industry. Taking account of recent changes in their case law, both the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and the European Patent Office (EPO) have recently updated their guidelines on patentable subject matter. During this seminar, we will discuss:

  • How natural product and diagnostic method claims will be examined
  • Tips for drafting software and computer-implemented inventions
  • What is meant by the new legal test: a “significant difference?”
  • Practical advice on the types of claims that may be obtainable

Just two years after the AIA post-grant challenges went into effect, the USPTO has already received over 2,000 requests challenging the validity of issued patents in what so far has been a very favorable jurisdiction for challengers. We will discuss the impact of the decisions received so far and the similarities and differences between these U.S. procedures and the corresponding EPO opposition system. We will also discuss best practices for successfully handling post-grant challenges and oppositions.

Admission is free, but space is limited so please reserve a space as soon as possible. Email

Time:

12:00 - 12:30
Registration and Light Lunch

12:30 - 16:30
Program 

16:30 - 17:30
Cocktail Reception 

Location:

The Sofitel Grand Amsterdam

Related Practices

Patent Drafting and Prosecution

Patent Term Extension (PTE) and Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC)

專利局受理之無效程序

Third-Party Observations

專利審理暨訴願委員會受理之無效程序: 多方複審及核准後複審

Patent Oppositions and Appeals

設計權利

Related Offices

London

Washington, DC

Related Professionals

Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4173
Email
Michele C. Bosch
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4193
Email

Related Insights

Lecture

IPIC/McGill Summer IP Course 2026: Understanding Trademarks

July 14, 2026

Montreal

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Articles

Colorado Replaces Landmark AI Act: An Overview of the New SB 26-189 Framework

May 26, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Claim Disclaimer Derails Instituted IPR in Freightcar America

May 26, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP