September 28, 2016
Webinar
Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)
As part of an IPO webinar series, Finnegan partner Eric P. Raciti will participate in a webinar discussion on patent prosecution practice since last year's en banc Federal Circuit decision in Williamson v. Citrix, covering the criteria used by the USPTO to decide whether a claim invokes Section 112(f) and what structural disclosure is enough to support such a claim. Panelists will also discuss the pros and cons of having a claim fall under Section 112(f) considering recent tighter application of Sections 112(b) and Section 101, the latest on best practices for prosecuting patents, and the concern that patents still being approved by the USPTO might not pass muster in litigation. For more information, or to register, please see the IPO's website.
Articles
California Reaches Record $12.75 Million CCPA Settlement with General Motors Over Driver Data
June 4, 2026
At the PTAB Blog
Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a
§ 325(d) EPR Denial
May 28, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.