直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
  • News
  • Finnegan Facts
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • Pro Bono
  • Management
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Under Armour Sues Body Armor Drink Maker to Protect Mark

April 30, 2012

Law360

On Thursday, April 26, Under Armour filed a trademark infringement suit in Maryland federal court accusing Body Armor, a sports drink maker, of “labeling its beverages with a name and logo that intended to deceive customers into believing the products fall under the Under Armour brand.”  The suit stated that, Body Armor “has shrouded its sports beverage with these hallmarks of Under Armour branding.  As a result, consumers are likely to believe defendant’s drink is made by Under Armour or approved or licensed by Under Armour.”  The suit filed by Under Armour “seeks an order declaring that the Body Armor name, logo, and slogan, as well as its website, infringe and dilute Under Armour’s trademark holdings, along with damages and an injunction preventing the drink maker from continued use of the marks.”  Under Armour is represented by Finnegan in this matter.

Related Practices

Trademark and Brand Management

Related Industries

Consumer Products

Related Professionals

Douglas A. Rettew
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4161
Email

Related News

Press Release

Finnegan Expands U.S. Platform with Launch of Dallas Office

September 2, 2026

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Award/Ranking

31 Finnegan Attorneys Recognized by Best Lawyers 2027

August 20, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Commentary

Why Global IP Litigants Keep Turning to English Courts

August 19, 2026

Press Release

Federal Circuit Overrules Precedent En Banc in Finnegan Pro Bono Victory for Federally Employed Veterans

August 18, 2026

Commentary

Fed. Circ. Overrules Precedent on Veteran Hiring Protections

August 14, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP