直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • 生命科学
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • 经验

商业秘密

About

我们为您的多元化创新提供多元化保护。发现商业秘密的真实价值

在今天的全球经济中,面对激烈的竞争、员工流动性、企业分拆以及创业型企业的激增,商业秘密的保护至关重要。通常,与公司新产品上市有关的配方、设备、技术、模式、工艺、数据整理及方法,人们往往忽视其知识产权方面的保护。 最近的头条新闻确认了来自竞争对手和民族国家的商业秘密盗用的危害性,并报道了在此类案件中的判决以及和解的金额往往为数百万甚至几亿美元不等。随着国会针对民事商业秘密盗用行为在联邦层面恢复兴趣,所有的发展都预示着商业秘密将继续作为企业知识产权战略中不可或缺的一部分。

飞翰专注于涉及复杂技术的商业秘密领域。本所在为高科技行业提供知识产权策略咨询服务领域拥有数十年经验,并且经常代理“决定公司命运”的案件。本所75多位专家持有各种学科的博士学位,从神经生物学到电气工程。本所深厚的技术专长使我们能够受理涉及专业技术的商业秘密案件。我们能够与工程师和科学家在某些独特的商业秘密事项中高效配合,例如自主研发、反向工程以及尖端技术。

为宝贵的商业秘密提供有力保护

飞翰为所有行业的客户提供全面的商业秘密保护和咨询服务,既有财富五百强(Fortune 500)、全球1000强公司(Global 1000),也有利于创新的创业公司和组织。我们与客户的法务、业务和技术人员密切合作,从创新或技术中甄别所有能利于商业秘密保护的内容。我们还密切关注各种类型的有保护价值的重要信息,为其提供专利或版权保护,或通过不同形式的保密与不竞争协议保护此类信息。

商业秘密的调查以及案件的流程通常较快。自问题发生之日起,速度对于防止商业秘密损失或控制损害非常关键。这正是飞翰的优势所在。无论遇到什么样的问题,我们都能及时提供全面的法律与技术资源。如果必须提起诉讼,我们将凭借对技术的深入了解,制定有说服力的有效策略,迅速解决问题。

本事务所律师在美国各联邦法院和州法院有数十年的诉讼经验,可在必要时协助客户通过诉讼保护自己的商业秘密,或应对竞争对手的挑战。商业秘密诉讼所面临的程序上的挑战有其独有的特点。在商业秘密诉讼过程中,我们善于利用单方禁制令、临时禁令、管理发现程序、从处分性动议中获得救济以及保护商业秘密。

飞翰提供全面的商业秘密服务

  • 在州法院、联邦法院、美国国际贸易委员会和仲裁法庭上代理商业秘密盗用案件
  • 就商业秘密盗用案件进行内部审计和调查程序
  • 甄别需要保护的商业秘密
  • 审查保密和安全的措施
  • 制定新的安全措施,防止商业秘密盗用或泄露
  • 起草与员工及第三方之间的恰当保密合同
  • 举行员工培训课程,培养保密意识
  • 为不受商业秘密保护的其他机密商业信息制定保护方法

Everyone in this practice

经验

Eastman Chemical Company & Others v. Covr Group Limited & Another
Finnegan represented Eastman Chemical Company, an independent global specialty materials company, and several of its subsidiaries in a UK dispute concerning copyright infringement, trade secret misappropriation, and breach of contract before the UK High Court. The dispute centered on a proprietary database of patterns used in automotive paint protection film. The parties reached a confidential settlement and the Defendants agreed not to infringe Eastman intellectual property rights in the future.

IL-2024-000026, UK High Court

Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Beard et al.

Represented Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in district court litigation involving claims of trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract against corporate and individual defendants relating to complex treatments for genetic disorders. Obtained successful outcome including permanent injunction and other remedies against all defendants.

3:24-cv-02170, D. Or., Judge Simon

Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Lexeo Therapeutics, Inc., et al.

Represented Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in district court litigation involving claims of trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract against individual and corporate defendants and relating to complex treatments for genetic disorders. Successfully opposed motion to dismiss key claims and obtained settlement with all defendants following completion of fact discovery.

1:23-cv-09000, S.D.N.Y., Judges Castel, Aaron

 Arvinas Operations, Inc. et al. v. Qian et al.

Defending Accutar Biotechnology, Inc. in a trade secret lawsuit brought by Arvinas regarding alleged trade secrets concerning breast cancer therapies.

3:22-cv-00717, D. Conn., Judges Chatigny, Richardson

Trade secret and breach of contract dispute resolved with favorable settlement for Finnegan client Meati Foods

Finnegan represented Emergy, Inc., d/b/a Meati Foods in a trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and correction of inventorship case against The Better Meat Company (BMC) and Augustus Pattillo involving alternative meat made from mycelium.

Emergy alleged that Augustus Pattillo stole its trade secrets on the cultivation and production of mycelium that he learned while working as a lab technician for Emergy’s founders, misused them in his work with BMC, breached his nondisclosure agreement with Emergy, and improperly filed patent applications on Emergy’s technology and assigned them to BMC.

BMC filed claims of tortious interference and unfair competition against Emergy, which Emergy succeeded in striking under California’s anti-Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP) statute. After prevailing under the anti-SLAPP statute, Emergy was statutorily entitled to recover its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for defending against BMC’s stricken claims of tortious interference and unfair competition

Early in the litigation, Emergy defeated BMC’s motion to dismiss Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation and breach of implied contract claims. Emergy later defeated BMC’s motion for summary judgment on Emergy’s trade secret misappropriation, breach of contract, and breach of implied contract claims. The case settled soon after the Court issued its summary judgment ruling.

2-21-cv-02338, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller
2-21-cv-02417, E.D. Cal., Judge Mueller

Bright Data Ltd. v. NetNut Ltd.

Represented NetNut in litigation in the Eastern District of Texas against Bright Data, related to Bright Data’s patents and trade secrets involving proxy server technology. The case resulted in a favorable dismissal for the client.

2:20-cv-00188, E.D. Tex., Judges Gilstrap, Payne

More

专业见解

Conference

WIPR Trade Secrets West

May 28, 2026

San Jose

Conference

IPOwners Spring Summit 2026

March 18-19,2026

Washington

Conference

IAM Live: Trade Secret Strategy Europe 2026

February 25, 2026

London

Conference

Korea IP Forum

February 3, 2026

Seoul

Articles

How the Timing of Hypothetical Negotiation Can Lead to a Higher Premium for Exclusivity

How the Timing of Hypothetical Negotiation Can Lead to a Higher Premium for Exclusivity

December/January 2026

Lecture

Introduction to Trade Secrets

January 26, 2026

Seattle

More

新闻

Press Release

Finnegan Enhances Its German and European IP Practice with Björn Kalbfus

April 30, 2026

Commentary

What xAI’s Challenge to California’s Generative AI Disclosure Law Means for Trade Secrets

January 6, 2026

Commentary

Top Trade Secrets Decisions of 2025

December 18, 2025

Commentary

The Beauty Founder’s Guide to Getting a Patent

July 17, 2025

Award/Ranking

World IP Review Lists Finnegan in Its 2024 Global Trade Secrets Rankings 

October 3, 2024

Award/Ranking

Four Finnegan Partners Named 2024 Rising Stars by Managing Intellectual Property

September 30, 2024

More

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP