直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • 联邦巡回法院知识产权博客
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • Prosecution First博客
  • Events & Webinars
  • 知识产权讯息
  • 播客
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Webinar

Practical Advice for Successfully Handling Post-Grant Challenges in the United States: How to Clear the Deck

April 30, 2014

Webinar

View Webinar

As of 13 March 2014, just 18 months after the new post-grant challenges went into effect, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has already received close to 1100 petitions. And the number of petitions continues to increase, in what so far has been a very favorable jurisdiction for challengers. While the majority of the filed petitions concern electrical and computer patents, there is a steady flow of new challenges being filed in the mechanical, medical device, life science, chemical and even design patent areas.

We will look closely at some of the valuable lessons already provided by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) including: the timeline for the proceedings is fast, claim construction is key, the patent owner’s ability to amend claims is very limited, discovery is also limited, and the rules of procedure are strictly followed. We will also compare and contrast post-grant review (PGR), covered business method (CBM), and inter partes review (IPR) proceedings to European Patent Office (EPO) oppositions, and explore the pros and cons of challenging validity in a post-grant proceeding before the PTAB.

Please join us as we discuss strategies and best practices for successfully handling post-grant challenges in the United States. Topics will include:

  • Strategies for taking advantage of the new procedures, including how to prepare a winning petition
  • Strategies for defending your patent when you find yourself in front of the PTAB
  • What is a redundant ground and why has it become so important?
  • Practical tips and considerations for oral hearings
  • How to best position yourself if there is an underlying or concurrent litigation

Moderator:

Eric P. Raciti

Speakers:

C. Gregory Gramenopoulos
Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D.

Date:
Wednesday, April 30,  2014

Time:

15:00 - 16:00 BST
16:00 - 17:00 CEST
10:00 a.m. - 11:00 a.m. EDT

Downloadable Files

  • Webinar: Practical Advice for Successfully Handling Post-Grant Challenges in the United States: How to Clear the Deck

Related Practices

专利局无效程序

第三方意见

PTAB无效程序:双方复审及授权后复审

欧洲专利异议和上诉

专利撰写与申办

专利期限延长(PTE)和补充保护证书(SPC)

外观设计知识产权

Related Industries

金融服务及商业系统

Related Professionals

C. Gregory Gramenopoulos
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4263
Email
Eric P. Raciti
Partner
Boston, MA
+1 617 646 1675
Email
Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D.
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4173
Email

Related Insights

Conference

7th International Conference on Biofuels and Bioenergy

June 25-26, 2026

Edinburgh

Charitable

Bridges From School to Work Gala 2026

June 22, 2026

Washington, DC

Charitable

Banding Together 2026

June 18, 2026

Washington, DC

Conference

IPBC Global 2026

June 15-17, 2026

San Diego

Conference

2026 Copyright Society Annual Meeting

June 14-16, 2026

Louisville

Conference

17th Summit on Biosimilars & Innovator Biologics

June 2-3, 2026

New York

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: April 2026

June 1, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Consistency Is Key – USPTO Issues Three New Informative Decisions

May 29, 2026

At the PTAB Blog

Discretion All the Way Down: USPTO Uses a Discretionary IPR Denial to Justify a    
§ 325(d) EPR Denial

May 28, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP