February 27, 2017
Law360
On February 27, 2017, the Federal Circuit ruled in favor of Finnegan clients PNC and SunTrust, upholding a district court's ruling that four Parus Holdings patents were invalid under the Supreme Court's Alice decision.
In November 2014, Parus Holdings filed a law suit against several financial institutions, including PNC and SunTrust, alleging infringement of four of its patents covering the unification of electronic communications such as email, text, and fax, and solving incompatibility problems. PNC and SunTrust argued that the patents were directed to an abstract idea and therefore invalid.
Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank International, United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.