直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Costs, Litigation Keep AIA Reviews of Design Patents Down

March 16, 2017

Law360

Cases at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) involving design patents are rare. Of the more than 6,4000 petitions filed at the PTAB since 2012, only 41 have challenged a design patent. Despite the increase in the number of design patent applications over the years, and the recent high-profile Apple v. Samsung design patent case at the Supreme Court, many attorneys believe that the cost of AIA reviews has contributed to the lack of proceedings involving design patents. Law360 reached to Finnegan attorney Elizabeth D. Ferrill for her thoughts.

Ferrill said, "If there’s a lawsuit involved, then the cost of the PGR maybe makes some sense. But if there’s no lawsuit, that’s a pretty expensive proposition to take on when you also consider that typically in cases with important, marquee products, the patent owner may still have a patent pending at the patent office." She said that while the number of design patent applications has risen, cases involving design patents have remained steady over the past decade, which may also explain why there haven't been more challenges at the PTAB. "If you view IPRs as typically being tied to litigation, the fact that the [patent application] filings go up doesn’t necessarily mean that the IPRs are going to go up," she said.

Tags

America Invents Act (AIA), Apple, Inc.

Related Practices

专利局无效程序

PTAB无效程序:双方复审及授权后复审

外观设计知识产权

Related Professionals

Elizabeth D. Ferrill
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4445
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

FORUM IP Talks: Dr. Jochen Herr on UPC, FRAND, and Cross-Border Enforcement Topics

September 20, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP