直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 我们的专业人员
  • 服务
  • 我们的见解
  • 办公室
  • 事务所
  • 人才招聘
Finnegan
  • 新闻
  • 飞翰事实
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • 慈善性法律援助
  • 管理层
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Charles T. Collins-Chase

Copyright Victory for Finnegan Client MRIS at the Fourth Circuit

July 25, 2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

July 25, 2013

Contact: Margaret A. Esquenet, Partner
margaret.esquenet@finnegan.com

Copyright Victory for Finnegan Client MRIS at the Fourth Circuit 

WASHINGTON, DC - On July 17, 2013, the Fourth Circuit issued its opinion affirming the preliminary injunction issued by Judge Williams in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland in Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. v. American Home Realty Network, Inc., Case No. 12-cv-0954-AW. The panel’s 3-0 decision sided with firm client Metropolitan Regional Information Systems, Inc. (“MRIS”) on each issue on appeal, including two issues of first impression in any circuit court: (1) the validity of electronic copyright assignments under the “writing requirement” set forth in Section 204 of the Copyright Act and the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (“E-SIGN”) and (2) whether Section 409 of the Copyright Act requires a registrant to list the names of authors and titles for each component work within a compilation.

The Fourth Circuit’s ruling that an electronic agreement may effect a valid transfer of copyright interests under Section 204 of the Copyright Act is the first of its kind, and has significant implications for the validity of electronic transfers in other areas. Regarding the Section 409 issue, the Fourth Circuit’s opinion disagreed with a number of district court cases holding that copyright registrants failed to comply with the requirements of Section 409 by not listing authors of component works in the application to register the compilation. The Fourth Circuit’s opinion will likely be heavily cited by the courts and other owners of copyright in compilations in the future.

About Finnegan

With more than 375 intellectual property lawyers, Finnegan is one of the largest IP law firms in the world. From offices in Washington, DC; Atlanta, Georgia; Boston, Massachusetts; Palo Alto, California; Reston, Virginia; Brussels, Belgium; Shanghai, China; Taipei, Taiwan; and Tokyo, Japan, the firm practices all aspects of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret law, including counseling, prosecution, licensing, and litigation. Finnegan also represents clients on IP issues related to international trade, portfolio management, the Internet, e-commerce, government contracts, antitrust, and unfair competition. For additional information on the firm, please visit www.finnegan.com.

###

Related Practices

全球知识产权维权、诉讼与审判

联邦巡回法院和最高法院上诉

著作权

Related Industries

电子与计算机技术

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized in 2026 BTI Client Service A-Team Rankings

June 22, 2026

Award/Ranking

Six Finnegan Partners Recognized in the 2026 Lawdragon 500 Leading Global IP Lawyers

June 22, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Taps Partner from Kirkland to Boost IP Team

June 12, 2026

Award/Ranking

World Trademark Review Recognizes Three Finnegan Partners on its 2026 Global Leaders List

June 24, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in the 2026 Legal 500 U.S. Guide

June 10, 2026

Media Mention

Finnegan Hires Kirkland & Ellis Litigator for London Office

June 8, 2026

Commentary

Finnegan Hires Kirkland Partner as It Eyes UK Growth

June 8, 2026

Award/Ranking

Forbes Names Finnegan Partner Erika Harmon Arner on its Inaugural 2026 America’s Top Women Lawyers List

June 5, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Earns Top Rankings in 2026 IAM Patent 1000 Guide; Nearly 60 Attorneys Ranked

May 28, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • 隐私
  • 免责申明
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP