直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • Articles & Books
    • Ad Law Buzz Blog
    • At the PTAB Blog
    • European IP Blog
    • CAFC控訴審関連ブログ
    • INCONTESTABLE® Blog
    • 出願関連ブログ
  • Events & Webinars
  • 知財最新ニュース
  • ポッドキャスト
    • AI + Finnegan
    • AI + Copyright
    • AI + Patent
    • AI + Privacy
    • AI + Trade Secrets
    • AI + Trademark
  • Unified Patent Court (UPC) Hub

Federal Circuit Rules on Broadening Reissues, Joint Inventorship, and Intervening Rights

April 19, 2012

Webinar

Keeping up with the growing body of case law is a must for IP lawyers. Federal Circuit decisions can impact a company’s IP portfolio strategy on many levels and in significant or subtle ways. Some decisions are of particular importance and well worth a closer look.

Please join our panelists as they discuss:

In re Staats

• Considered whether an applicant can add broadened claims in a continuing reissue application filed outside section 251’s two-year limit

• Held that because Staats timely filed an original broadening reissue application within the two-year limit, he was not barred from seeking broadened continuation reissue claims even though they were directed to subject matter different from the original reissue application

Falana v. Kent State University

• Considered whether a researcher who creates a method of making a new class of chemical compounds should be named as a co-inventor of claims directed to the compounds themselves

• Held that discovery of the method is as much a contribution to the compounds as the discovery of the compounds themselves, requiring the creator of the method to be named as a co-inventor

Marine Polymer v. HemCon, Inc. (en banc)

• Considered whether a patentee’s arguments made during ex parte reexamination can give rise to intervening rights under 35 U.S.C. § 307(b) when the patent claims in question are not changed during the reexamination

• Held that intervening rights apply only to “amended or new” claims incorporated into a patent during reexamination

The analysis and discussion will be led by seasoned Federal Circuit practitioners Michael J. Flibbert and Kara F. Stoll. Mike has successfully represented clients in patent disputes before the Federal Circuit involving technologies such as pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, and chemistry. Kara has represented clients in over thirty appeals to the Federal Circuit, primarily focusing on consumer electronics, computer, software, and the medical device industries. As former court clerks, both Mike and Kara have gained experience at the Federal Circuit from multiple perspectives.

This webinar is the second in our 2012 Federal Circuit webinar series. We hope you are able to attend.





Speakers


Michael J. Flibbert

Kara F. Stoll



Time


1:00 - 2:00 p.m. EDT

Register

There is no charge to attend this program. Please register by April 16, 2012. Webinar access and dial-in information will be sent upon registration.

Downloadable Files

  • Federal Circuit Rules on Broadening Reissues, Joint Inventorship, and Intervening Rights

Related Practices

グローバルな知的財産権利の執行、訴訟、および裁判

Related Professionals

Michael J. Flibbert
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4493
Email

Related Insights

Webinar

Successful Strategies to Win Alice Motions and Fee Awards in Patent Cases Against Non-Practicing Entities

July 22, 2026

Webinar

Webinar

Early Motions in Trade Secret Litigation – Offensive and Defensive Insights

July 15, 2026

Webinar

Federal Circuit IP Blog

“2” Does Not Provide Written Description Support for “1”: Federal Circuit Affirms District Court’s Invalidation of Patent

July 8, 2026

Federal Circuit IP Blog

Federal Circuit Vacates and Remands Infringement and Damages Judgment After Erroneous Verdict Form and Eligibility Analysis

July 8, 2026

Webinar

Inventive Step in Europe and the US: Comparing the UPC, EPO and National Approaches

July 8, 2026

Webinar

At the PTAB Blog

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics for March–May 2026

July 2, 2026

Articles

EPR Academy, Part 4 of 6: Choosing Between EPR, IPR, PGR, and Reissue

July 1, 2026

Articles

Article_D.-Mass-Patent-Litigation-Update-October-2024

D. Mass. Patent Litigation Update: May 2026

June 30, 2026

Articles

How Low Can You Go? Courts Lower Marking Defense Burden, Raising Patent Damages Risks

June 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP