On April 21, a California judge ruled in favor of Finnegan client Asetek, deciding that two of their patents weren’t invalid for obviousness. In 2013, Asetek filed suit against CMI USA Inc. accusing CMI’s liquid cooling system for computers of infringing two Asetek patents. CMI claimed that the patents were obvious based on prior art and therefore invalid. In December 2014, a jury found that CMI’s cooling system infringed one of the patents and awarded nearly $405,000 in damages to Asetek.
Press Release
October 6, 2026
Commentary
Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool
September 25, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027
September 24, 2026
Press Release
Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower
September 23, 2026
Award/Ranking
Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026
September 23, 2026
Commentary
New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret
September 21, 2026
Commentary
Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say
September 17, 2026
Commentary
Uncrustables Fame Ruling Sets Up Functionality Fight Over Crimped Edge
September 11, 2026
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.