直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • 最新情報
  • Finneganについて
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • プロボノ活動
  • 事務所運営管理
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

James R. Barney

Future of Fee Shifting in Balance at Supreme Court

February 26, 2014

Managing Intellectual Property

On Wednesday, February 26, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in Octane Fitness v. Icon Health and Highmark v. Allcare. The “two complementary cases” ”concern Section 285 of the Patent Act, which provides for awarding attorney fees to the prevailing parties ‘in exceptional cases’.” Finnegan represents Allcare in the matter, “marking the Supreme Court debut of Finnegan’s veteran litigator Donald Dunner on behalf of Allcare.”

Ahead of oral arguments, Finnegan partner and Allcare counsel Erik R. Puknys spoke with Managing IP. He said Allcare’s position advocates that the Federal Circuit has more expertise in patent cases and should not have to defer to district courts. “Congress has intended that the Federal Circuit be essentially the singular voice of the American courts on what the patent laws mean, subject to some checks by the Supreme Court now and then,” Puknys said. “So it is our view that this is an issue of law that whenever an appellate court is looking at a district court’s legal decision they just look to see if they got it right, and there is no deference to the district court. If the district court made an error of law it ought to reverse.” A decision is expected in May or early June.

Related Professionals

Erik R. Puknys
Partner
Palo Alto, CA
+1 650 849 6644
Email

Related News

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Recognized Again Among Germany’s Leading Law Firms

October 9, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Summary Determination of No Violation in ITC Vehicle Space Guards Investigation for Drop Stop

October 6, 2026

Commentary

Federal Circuit Revives Whistleblower Complaint Over VA's AI Claims-Processing Tool

September 25, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Named an IP Litigation Powerhouse in BTI Litigation Outlook 2027

September 24, 2026

Press Release

Finnegan Secures Precedential Pro Bono Federal Circuit Victory for AI Whistleblower

September 23, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Top Tier Rankings in World Trademark Review’s Inaugural Copyright 1000 2026

September 23, 2026

Commentary

New Thomas Pink Womenswear Lines Strain ‘Pink’ Pact with Victoria’s Secret

September 21, 2026

Commentary

Pepsi's U.S. Trademark Dispute Could Reshape Brand Choices, Lawsuit Strategy, Lawyers Say

September 17, 2026

Commentary

Jellycat’s ‘Dupe’ Dilemma: Can IP Protect a ‘Cute’ Aesthetic?

September 16, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP