直 Japanese PDF Font
  • 弁護士等
  • 業務内容
  • 論文等
  • オフィス
  • 事務所概要
  • 採用情報
Finnegan
  • 最新情報
  • Finneganについて
  • History
    • Finnegan VISION
    • Finnegan FORWARD
  • プロボノ活動
  • 事務所運営管理
    • Pricing & Alternative Fee Arrangements
    • AFA Models We Offer
    • Contingency Fees
    • AI + KM

Charles T. Collins-Chase

District Court Rules in Favor of Finnegan Client Cephalon to Uphold Patent for Nuvigil®

March 30, 2013

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

March 30, 2013

Contact:    Barbara R. Rudolph, 202.408.4346

                    Partner

District Court Rules in Favor of Finnegan Client Cephalon to Uphold Patent for Nuvigil®

WASHINGTON, DC - On March 30, 2013, Cephalon Inc., Cephalon France, and Teva Santé SAS received a favorable decision from the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware in In Re Armodafinil Patent Litigation, 1:10-md-2200.The court found valid the listed patent for the active ingredient in Cephalon’s wakefulness improving drug, Nuvigil®.

Having already conceded infringement prior to trial, four generic pharmaceutical companies alleged that the listed patent (U.S. patent no. 7,132,570), claiming a particular polymorphic form of armodafinil, was anticipated and obvious. Chief Judge Gregory M. Sleet found that the generic defendants failed to demonstrate inherent anticipation and he held that the generic defendants’ experts did not show clearly and convincingly that the claimed form of armodafinil was the “necessary and inevitable result” of practicing the prior art patent. The court further held that the polymorphic form of armodafinil claimed in the patent would not have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art.

Chief Judge Sleet enjoined the generic defendants from manufacturing, using, offering for sale, or selling their proposed armodafinil ANDA products, and further enjoined the FDA from approving the defendants’ ANDAs, before the expiration of Cephalon’s patent covering Nuvigil®.

About Finnegan

With more than 375 intellectual property lawyers, Finnegan is one of the largest IP law firms in the world. From offices in Washington, DC; Atlanta, Georgia; Boston, Massachusetts; Palo Alto, California; Reston, Virginia; Brussels, Belgium; Shanghai, China; Taipei, Taiwan; and Tokyo, Japan, the firm practices all aspects of patent, trademark, copyright, and trade secret law, including counseling, prosecution, licensing, and litigation. Finnegan also represents clients on IP issues related to international trade, portfolio management, the Internet, e-commerce, government contracts, antitrust, and unfair competition. For additional information on the firm, please visit www.finnegan.com.

###

Related Practices

グローバルな知的財産権利の執行、訴訟、および裁判

Related Industries

製薬

Related News

Commentary

East Texas Reclaims Its Patent Crown

August 21, 2026

Commentary

Early Test of USPTO's Ex Parte Preorder Filing Leads to Re-Exam Denial

August 21, 2026

Press Release

USPTO Denies Super Lighting Reexamination Request Following PVTECH Pre-Order Submission Under New USPTO Procedure

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

Federal Circuit Backs Volkswagen’s $207,500 Fees Against NPE

August 19, 2026

Media Mention

VW Wins in Patent Appeal Over Electrically Controlled Glasses

August 19, 2026

Award/Ranking

Fourteen Finnegan Attorneys Named to the 2026 IAM Strategy 300 List

August 13, 2026

Award/Ranking

Finnegan Receives Tier 1 Rankings from Managing IP; More than 30 Attorneys Named 2026 IP Stars

July 30, 2026

Commentary

A Win in Every Forum: Judge Terminates Zync's Case Against BMW

July 30, 2026

Press Release

BMW Secures Landmark ITC Victory: ALJ Terminates Zync Investigation Based on Forum-Selection Clause

July 29, 2026

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • プライバシー
  • 免責事項
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP