Successfully proving noninfringement for Topcon Instrument’s glaucoma device

We defended Topcon Instrument against a multi-patent ITC case brought by Cambridge Instruments involving devices for diagnosing glaucoma. In a one-week trial held just two months after the case began, we established that Topcon’s instruments were not covered by the patents, and the ITC judge thus denied Cambridge Instruments’ motion for temporary relief. When Cambridge Instruments persisted in its claims and sought a trial on the merits, the judge again ruled in our favor that Topcon’s instruments were not covered by the patents. The matter was promptly settled.