Experience
Ruyan Investment Ltd.
Sottera, Inc.
Defended Sottera against charges of patent infringement on its electronic cigarettes.
Ruyan Investment Ltd. v. Sottera, Inc., 2:12-cv-05454, C.D. Cal., Judges Feess, Gee, King, Mumm
Fenner Investments, Ltd. v. Juniper Networks, Inc.
Nortel Networks, Inc.
Universal Audio, Inc. v. Earbyte, Inc.
Universal Audio, Inc.
Linak A/S et al. v. Changzou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. et al.
Changzou Kaidi Electrical Co., Ltd. et al.
Hybritech Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories
Hybritech Inc.
USB Technologies, LLC v. ADATA Technology USA Co., Ltd.
ADATA Technology USA Co., Ltd.
Patagonia, Inc. v. Chelsea International Inc.
Patagonia, Inc.
Christie Digital Systems USA, Inc. v. U.S. Philips Corp.
U.S. Philips Corp.
Advanced Aerodynamics, LLC v. DJI Technology, Inc.
DJI Technology, Inc.
Koninklijke Philips NV et al. v. Tongfang Global Inc. et al.
Koninklijke Philips NV et al.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.