Experience
ParkerVision, Inc.
Qualcomm Inc.
Member of appellate team seeking to reverse the district court's decision to vacate a $170 million jury infringement verdict.
ParkerVision, Inc. v. Qualcomm Inc., 14-1612, -1655, Fed. Cir., Judges Bryson, Chen, Lourie
Rambus, Inc. v. Micron Technology, Inc.
Rambus, Inc.
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien LP
Covidien LP
Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC and Rembrandt Secure Computing, LP v. Apple Inc.
Rembrandt Patent Innovations, LLC; Rembrandt Secure Computing
Pozen Inc. v. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Inc.
Horizon Medicines LLC
NetMoneyIN, Inc. v. Verisign, Inc.
Verisign, Inc.
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc. v. Movea, Inc.
Hillcrest Laboratories, Inc.
Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. CQG, Inc.
Trading Technologies International, Inc.
Prolitec Inc. v. Scentair Techs., Inc.
Prolitec Inc.
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.