Experience
Lighting Ballast Control
Philips North America
Deposed the inventor in a case involving fluorescent lighting ballasts, gaining key admissions that led the court to rule that the asserted claims were invalid for lack of disclosure of any structure corresponding to a claimed means-plus-function element.
Lighting Ballast Control v. Philips North America, 7:09-cv-00029, N.D. Tex., Judge O'Connor
Coronary Stent Visualization Corp. v. Philips Electronic North America Corp.
Philips Electronic North America Corp.
Hospital Systems Corp. v. Philips North America LLC
Philips North America LLC
Bluestone Innovations LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Corp.
Philips Electronics North America Corp.
Global Equity Management (SA) Pt. Ltd. v. Philips Electronics North America Corp. et al.
Philips Electronics North America Corp. et al.
Feit Electric Company, Inc. v. Philips Lighting North America Corp.
Philips Lighting North America Corp.
Sonix Tech. Co., Ltd. v. VTech Electronics North America, LLC
VTech Electronics North America, LLC
Voice Domain Technologies LLC v. Philips Electronics North America Inc.
Philips Electronics North America Inc.
Dr. Systems Inc. v. Philips North America LLC
Philips North America LLC
Stragent, LLC v. BMW of North America, LLC
BMW of North America, LLC
Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.
We use cookies on this website to provide you with the best user experience. By accepting cookies, you agree to our use of cookies. Please note that if you opt not to accept or if you disable cookies, the “Your Finnegan” feature on this website will be disabled as well. For more information on how we use cookies, please see our Privacy Policy.
Finnegan is thrilled to announce the launch of our new blog, Ad Law Buzz, devoted solely to breaking news, developments, trends, and analysis in advertising law.