直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Federal Circuit win for Eli Lilly’s Xigris®, a recombinant form of human Activated Protein

Ariad Pharmaceuticals

Eli Lilly and Company

Finnegan successfully represented Eli Lilly in connection with a lawsuit brought by Ariad Pharmaceuticals, accusing Lilly’s Xigris® product of infringing Ariad’s patent covering “NF-κB” technology. After a full en banc hearing, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held Ariad’s patent invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112 for failing to comply with the written description requirement.

Ariad Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly and Company, 08-1248, Fed. Cir., Judges Michel, Newman, Mayer, Lourie, Rader, Bryson, Gajarsa, Linn, Dyk, Prost, Moore

Ariad Pharmaceuticals v. Eli Lilly and Company, 1:02-cv-11280, D. Mass., Judge Zobel

Related Professionals

Jennifer H. Roscetti
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4150
Email

Related Practices

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials

Branded Hatch-Waxman (ANDA) Litigation and Trials

Related Industries

Life Sciences

Pharmaceutical

Related Experiences

Favorable Federal Circuit ruling confirms the existence of a separate written description requirement

Eli Lilly and Company

The Hillman Group, Inc. v. KeyMe, LLC

The Hillman Group, Inc.

MontaVista v. Lineo

Monta Vista

Pfizer Inc. v. Bayer AG

GlaxoSmithKline

Hamilton v. Placeware, Inc. 

Placeware, Inc.

Zymogenetics, Inc. v. Immunex Corp.

Immunex Corp.

Urologix Inc. v. Prostalund AB

ACMI Circon Corp.

GlaxoSmithKline v. Alphapharm

GlaxoSmithKline

L'Oreal S.A. v. Clairol Inc. and Estee Lauder, Inc.

L'Oreal, S.A.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP