直 Japanese PDF Font
  • Our Professionals
  • Our Work
  • Our Insights
  • Offices
  • Firm
  • Careers
Finnegan
    • AI + Finnegan
    • Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy
    • Diligence, Licensing, and Opinions
    • Global IP Enforcement, Litigation, and Trials
    • Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings
    • Prosecution and Portfolio Management
    • Trademark and Brand Management
    • AI, Electronics, and Information Technology
    • Chemicals, Industrials, and Materials
    • Communications
    • Consumer Goods and Services
    • Energy
    • Hospitality, Gaming, and Leisure
    • Life Sciences
    • Transportation and Logistics
  • Experience

Experience

Federal Circuit vacates IPR rulings in two appeals in favor of Finnegan client PPC Broadband

PPC Broadband

Corning Optical Communications

In two related appeals from inter partes review (IPR) proceedings, Finnegan successfully persuaded the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit to vacate and remand the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (PTAB) decisions that adversely affected three patents related to coaxial cable connectors owned by client PPC Broadband. In the first appeal, for a majority of the claims, the Federal Circuit agreed with PPC that the PTAB overlooked a key claim limitation, and it therefore vacated and remanded the obviousness decision. For the remainder of the claims in that appeal, the court affirmed the claim construction ruling as the broadest reasonable interpretation, but noted that it would not be the “correct” construction had the Phillips standard applied. Finally, the court also agreed with PPC that the PTAB erred in disregarding much of the evidence on secondary considerations, including the commercial success of the accused products. In the second appeal, the court likewise agreed with PPC and vacated the PTAB’s claim construction as being unreasonable, stating that while the construction may have been the broadest interpretation, it was not the broadest reasonable interpretation in light of the specification. The Federal Circuit thus vacated and remanded the invalidity determinations in both appeals.

PPC Broadband v. Corning Optical Communications, 15-1361, -1366, -1368, -1369; 15-1364, Fed. Cir., Judges Moore, O’Malley, Wallach

Related Professionals

J. Michael Jakes
Partner
Washington, DC
+1 202 408 4045
Email

Related Practices

Appeals from the PTAB

Appeals, Issues, and Legal Strategy

Federal Circuit and Supreme Court Appeals

Patent Office Invalidation Proceedings

PTAB Invalidation Proceedings: IPR and PGR

Related Industries

AI, Electronics, and Information Technology

Electrical and Computer Technology

Related Experiences

Federal Circuit affirms $61 million win for PPC Broadband

PPC Broadband, Inc

Federal Circuit reverses ITC finding in favor of Finnegan client John Mezzalingua Associates

John Mezzalingua Associates, Inc.

PTAB rules in favor of Finnegan client Neste Oil Oyj in IPR proceeding

Neste Oyj

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client InterDigital in appeal from ITC case

InterDigital Communications Corp.

Federal Circuit reverses district court ruling of invalidity and upholds rulings on other grounds in favor of Finnegan client Eli Lilly and Co.

Eli Lilly and Company

Federal Circuit affirms claim construction and summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of Finnegan client Pergo

Pergo LLC

Inter partes reexamination ruling affirmed in favor of Finnegan client MeadWestvaco

Kappos

Federal Circuit rules in favor of Finnegan client in radial arm saw guard patent case

Michael S. Powell

Federal Circuit reverses IPR decision, invalidates all claims challenged by Finnegan clients DuPont and Archer-Daniels-Midland

E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. and Archer Daniels Midland Co.

Due to international data regulations, we’ve updated our privacy policy. Click here to read our privacy policy in full.

  • Privacy
  • Disclaimer
  • Legal Notices
  • Fraud Alert
  • EEO Statement
  • Cookies
  • Contact Us

© 2026 Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP